Trust, technocracy, and the public servant’s bargain: The evolving role of Canadian health leaders post-COVID

Public servants are central in helping Canadians navigate public health crises. Before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic, these professionals have been essential to implementing widespread government interventions, sometimes amid significant public scrutiny. These experiences highlight the delicate balance public health officials maintain in a democracy: providing expert advice to cabinet to define the public good and implementing decisions to help preserve public health. Notwithstanding varying scopes for autonomous decision-making, chief medical officers of health aid elected officials in weighing tradeoffs in the pursuit of communal objectives, not by dictating them but by enabling informed decision-making. In recent years, there have been calls for public health officials to substitute their judgement for that of elected officials in issuing directives. This article explores the role of public health officials as public servants and the perils of these officials misunderstanding their roles which may undermine the effectiveness and legitimacy of policy decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare Management Forum
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704251320301
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trust, technocracy, and the public servant’s bargain: The evolving role of Canadian health leaders post-COVID

Jared J. Wesley, Samuel Goertz
3 citations
Healthcare Management Forum
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
8.45
article

Trust, technocracy, and the public servant’s bargain: The evolving role of Canadian health leaders post-COVID

Jared J. Wesley, Samuel Goertz
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Public servants are central in helping Canadians navigate public health crises. Before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic, these professionals have been essential to implementing widespread government interventions, sometimes amid significant public scrutiny. These experiences highlight the delicate balance public health officials maintain in a democracy: providing expert advice to cabinet to define the public good and implementing decisions to help preserve public health. Notwithstanding varying scopes for autonomous decision-making, chief medical officers of health aid elected officials in weighing tradeoffs in the pursuit of communal objectives, not by dictating them but by enabling informed decision-making. In recent years, there have been calls for public health officials to substitute their judgement for that of elected officials in issuing directives. This article explores the role of public health officials as public servants and the perils of these officials misunderstanding their roles which may undermine the effectiveness and legitimacy of policy decisions.

Healthcare Management ForumVol. 38(6)
University of Alberta (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
8.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Trust, technocracy, and the public servant’s bargain: The evolving role of Canadian health leaders post-COVID — Jared J. Wesley, Samuel Goertz · Healthcare Management Forum (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS