The pupillary respiratory‐phase response: pupil size is smallest around inhalation onset and largest during exhalation

Respiration shapes brain activity and synchronizes sensory and exploratory motor actions, with some evidence suggesting that it also affects pupil size. However, evidence for a coupling between respiration and pupil size remains scarce and inconclusive, hindered by small sample sizes and limited controls. Given the importance of pupil size in visual perception and as a reflection of brain state, understanding its relationship with respiration is essential. In five experiments using a pre-registered protocol, we systematically investigated how respiratory phase affects pupil size across different conditions. In Experiment 1 (n = 50), we examined nasal and oral breathing at rest under dim lighting with nearby fixation points, then replicated these results under identical conditions in Experiment 2 (n = 53). Experiment 3 (n = 112) extended this to active visual tasks, while Experiment 4 (n = 57) extended this to controlled breathing at different paces under ambient lighting with distant fixation. Finally, in Experiment 5 (n = 34), individuals with isolated congenital anosmia (born without olfactory bulbs) were used as a lesion-type model during visual-auditory tasks to assess whether the respiratory-pupil link depends on olfactory bulb-driven oscillations. Across all conditions - free and controlled breathing; different tasks, lighting and fixation distances; and with and without olfactory bulbs - we consistently found that pupil size is smallest around inhalation onset and largest during exhalation. We term this effect the pupillary respiratory-phase response, the fourth known mechanism influencing pupil size, alongside the pupillary light, near fixation and psychosensory responses. KEY POINTS: The influence of respiration on pupil size dynamics has long been debated. In this study, we systematically investigated how pupil size changes across the breathing cycle through a series of five experiments, while varying tasks, lighting, fixation distance and brain region involvement. We show that pupil size is smallest around inhalation onset and largest during exhalation, with pupil dilatation occurring through most of inhalation and the early phase of exhalation, and pupil constriction occurring primarily during the latter part of exhalation. This pattern was consistent across all experimental conditions, demonstrating that it is robust and likely controlled by brainstem circuits. We term this effect the pupillary respiratory-phase response, the fourth known mechanism influencing pupil size.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physiology
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1113/jp287205
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The pupillary respiratory‐phase response: pupil size is smallest around inhalation onset and largest during exhalation

Sebastiaan Mathôt, Artin Arshamian, Mikael Lundqvist, Martin Schaefer et al.
12 citations
The Journal of Physiology
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
17.58
article

The pupillary respiratory‐phase response: pupil size is smallest around inhalation onset and largest during exhalation

Sebastiaan Mathôt, Artin Arshamian, Mikael Lundqvist, Martin Schaefer, Johan N. Lundström
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Respiration shapes brain activity and synchronizes sensory and exploratory motor actions, with some evidence suggesting that it also affects pupil size. However, evidence for a coupling between respiration and pupil size remains scarce and inconclusive, hindered by small sample sizes and limited controls. Given the importance of pupil size in visual perception and as a reflection of brain state, understanding its relationship with respiration is essential. In five experiments using a pre-registered protocol, we systematically investigated how respiratory phase affects pupil size across different conditions. In Experiment 1 (n = 50), we examined nasal and oral breathing at rest under dim lighting with nearby fixation points, then replicated these results under identical conditions in Experiment 2 (n = 53). Experiment 3 (n = 112) extended this to active visual tasks, while Experiment 4 (n = 57) extended this to controlled breathing at different paces under ambient lighting with distant fixation. Finally, in Experiment 5 (n = 34), individuals with isolated congenital anosmia (born without olfactory bulbs) were used as a lesion-type model during visual-auditory tasks to assess whether the respiratory-pupil link depends on olfactory bulb-driven oscillations. Across all conditions - free and controlled breathing; different tasks, lighting and fixation distances; and with and without olfactory bulbs - we consistently found that pupil size is smallest around inhalation onset and largest during exhalation. We term this effect the pupillary respiratory-phase response, the fourth known mechanism influencing pupil size, alongside the pupillary light, near fixation and psychosensory responses. KEY POINTS: The influence of respiration on pupil size dynamics has long been debated. In this study, we systematically investigated how pupil size changes across the breathing cycle through a series of five experiments, while varying tasks, lighting, fixation distance and brain region involvement. We show that pupil size is smallest around inhalation onset and largest during exhalation, with pupil dilatation occurring through most of inhalation and the early phase of exhalation, and pupil constriction occurring primarily during the latter part of exhalation. This pattern was consistent across all experimental conditions, demonstrating that it is robust and likely controlled by brainstem circuits. We term this effect the pupillary respiratory-phase response, the fourth known mechanism influencing pupil size.

The Journal of PhysiologyVol. 603(6)
Karolinska University Hospital (SE), University of Groningen (NL), Monell Chemical Senses Center (US), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Institute of Cognitive and Brain Sciences (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Vetenskapsrådet
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
17.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.