A Numerical Comparison of Eigenfunction Matching and Singularity-Respecting Galerkin Approximation Methods for Linear Water Wave Scattering

The convergence of two numerical methods for solving linear water wave scattering problems, namely the eigenfunction matching method (EMM) and the singularity-respecting Galerkin approximation (SRGA), is examined. To do so, the methods are applied to two simple problems, namely scattering by a partially submerged vertical barrier and scattering in a parallel walled channel with a step change in width. These problems contain corner singularities in the velocity potential of order −1/2 and −1/3, respectively, which the SRGA accounts for but EMMs do not. The results presented to compare the methods show that SRGA solutions are consistently more accurate than EMM solutions for the same amount of computing time. The results also show that the EMM solution for the channel problem is more accurate than the EMM solution for the vertical barrier problem due to the weaker singularity. Nevertheless, the EMM for the barrier is shown to still converge beyond three decimal places if a sufficiently large matrix is used—slower computation may be a worthwhile trade-off in certain situations because the EMM is usually considered to be more straightforward to implement. Our results serve as a practical guide for researchers selecting between the numerical methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13030398
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Wave and Wind Energy Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Numerical Comparison of Eigenfunction Matching and Singularity-Respecting Galerkin Approximation Methods for Linear Water Wave Scattering

Ben Wilks, Michael Howard Meylan
6 citations
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Wave and Wind Energy Systems
6.87
article

A Numerical Comparison of Eigenfunction Matching and Singularity-Respecting Galerkin Approximation Methods for Linear Water Wave Scattering

Ben Wilks, Michael Howard Meylan
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The convergence of two numerical methods for solving linear water wave scattering problems, namely the eigenfunction matching method (EMM) and the singularity-respecting Galerkin approximation (SRGA), is examined. To do so, the methods are applied to two simple problems, namely scattering by a partially submerged vertical barrier and scattering in a parallel walled channel with a step change in width. These problems contain corner singularities in the velocity potential of order −1/2 and −1/3, respectively, which the SRGA accounts for but EMMs do not. The results presented to compare the methods show that SRGA solutions are consistently more accurate than EMM solutions for the same amount of computing time. The results also show that the EMM solution for the channel problem is more accurate than the EMM solution for the vertical barrier problem due to the weaker singularity. Nevertheless, the EMM for the barrier is shown to still converge beyond three decimal places if a sufficiently large matrix is used—slower computation may be a worthwhile trade-off in certain situations because the EMM is usually considered to be more straightforward to implement. Our results serve as a practical guide for researchers selecting between the numerical methods.

Journal of Marine Science and EngineeringVol. 13(3)
University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Wave and Wind Energy Systems
6.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.