Multi-country evidence on societal factors to include in energy transition modelling

Integrated assessment and energy system models are challenged to account for societal transformation dynamics, but empirical evidence is lacking on which factors to incorporate, how and to what extent this would improve the relevance of modelled pathways. Here we include six societal factors related to infrastructure dynamics, actors and decision-making, and social and institutional context into an open-source simulation model of the national power system transition. We apply this model in 31 European countries and, using hindcasting (1990-2019), quantify which societal factors improved the modelled pathways. We find that, if well-chosen and in most cases, incorporating societal factors can improve the hindcasting performance by up to 27% for modelled installed capacity of individual technologies. Public acceptance, investment risks and infrastructure lock<i>-</i>in contribute the most to model performance improvement. Our study paves the way to a systematic and objective selection of societal factors to be included in energy transition modelling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Energy
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-025-01719-7
Citations
20
Primary Topic
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-country evidence on societal factors to include in energy transition modelling

Evelina Trutnevyte, Marc Jaxa-Rozen, Vivien Fisch-Romito, Xin Wen
20 citations
Nature Energy
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
14.61
article

Multi-country evidence on societal factors to include in energy transition modelling

Evelina Trutnevyte, Marc Jaxa-Rozen, Vivien Fisch-Romito, Xin Wen
article en
20 citations

Abstract

Integrated assessment and energy system models are challenged to account for societal transformation dynamics, but empirical evidence is lacking on which factors to incorporate, how and to what extent this would improve the relevance of modelled pathways. Here we include six societal factors related to infrastructure dynamics, actors and decision-making, and social and institutional context into an open-source simulation model of the national power system transition. We apply this model in 31 European countries and, using hindcasting (1990-2019), quantify which societal factors improved the modelled pathways. We find that, if well-chosen and in most cases, incorporating societal factors can improve the hindcasting performance by up to 27% for modelled installed capacity of individual technologies. Public acceptance, investment risks and infrastructure lock<i>-</i>in contribute the most to model performance improvement. Our study paves the way to a systematic and objective selection of societal factors to be included in energy transition modelling.

Nature EnergyVol. 10(4)
University of Geneva (CH), Joint Research Center (ES), University of Lausanne (CH)
National Science Foundation, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Université de Genève
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
14.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Multi-country evidence on societal factors to include in energy transition modelling — Evelina Trutnevyte, Marc Jaxa-Rozen, et al. · Nature Energy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS