Decision-making by students in lab courses: stimulating students’ reasoning when choosing apparatus in experiments

Abstract Making substantiated decisions is an important critical thinking skill. In this exploratory longitudinal study with limited means we look at students substantiating their choice of apparatus for experiments. In our undergraduate lab we gave students the opportunity to choose from two different sets of equipment in experiments on oscillations and waves. Students’ choices were registered and they were asked about the reasoning behind their choice. Their reasonings were compared to Svenson’s 4 levels of decision making. The results show that when given the chance just under 20% of the students take decisions on the lowest level 1. More than half of the students take decisions on level 2 and about 20% of the students take a decision on level 3: valid (technical) reasons for their preference. This number appears to increase when students are asked not to perform two experiments with their chosen set of equipment but only one. Giving students the opportunity to make their own decisions is therefore recommended for other lab courses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Physics Conference Series
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2950/1/012014
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decision-making by students in lab courses: stimulating students’ reasoning when choosing apparatus in experiments

P S W M Logman, Matthijs Rog, Nazly Sedghinejad
Journal of Physics Conference Series
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Decision-making by students in lab courses: stimulating students’ reasoning when choosing apparatus in experiments

P S W M Logman, Matthijs Rog, Nazly Sedghinejad
article en

Abstract

Abstract Making substantiated decisions is an important critical thinking skill. In this exploratory longitudinal study with limited means we look at students substantiating their choice of apparatus for experiments. In our undergraduate lab we gave students the opportunity to choose from two different sets of equipment in experiments on oscillations and waves. Students’ choices were registered and they were asked about the reasoning behind their choice. Their reasonings were compared to Svenson’s 4 levels of decision making. The results show that when given the chance just under 20% of the students take decisions on the lowest level 1. More than half of the students take decisions on level 2 and about 20% of the students take a decision on level 3: valid (technical) reasons for their preference. This number appears to increase when students are asked not to perform two experiments with their chosen set of equipment but only one. Giving students the opportunity to make their own decisions is therefore recommended for other lab courses.

Journal of Physics Conference SeriesVol. 2950(1)
Leiden University (NL), University of Applied Sciences Leiden (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Decision-making by students in lab courses: stimulating students’ reasoning when choosing apparatus in experiments — P S W M Logman, Matthijs Rog, et al. · Journal of Physics Conference Series (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS