Building Partnerships to Identify and Address Wildfire Smoke and Extreme Heat Health Effects in Priority Populations

Background: The health impacts of extreme heat and wildfire smoke events are unevenly distributed; climate-sensitive populations are more exposed, more sensitive, and less likely to have the resources to respond. In this article, we describe the process of building a community-academic-local government partnership and conducting a climate survey with climate-sensitive populations to inform city-wide climate adaptation planning efforts in San Francisco, California. Materials and Methods: We formed a Community Stakeholder Group (CSG) with seven representatives from community organizations serving residents disproportionately affected by extreme climate weather events. The CSG identified priority populations, developed conceptual models, and developed and disseminated a climate survey. Results: CSG member engagement and satisfaction were high; 100% agreed that their opinions were valued and that they could talk openly. 95% and 98% of climate survey respondents ( n = 529) experienced at least one negative health outcome during extreme heat and wildfire smoke events, respectively. While 50%–75% of survey respondents implemented simple protective actions, the majority were unable to make substantial material and structural changes to their living environment that could significantly reduce their exposure to extreme heat and poor air quality. Major barriers included the high cost of repairs/materials, being a renter, and being unstably housed or unhoused. Conclusion: Our project is unique in the multi-stakeholder partnership formed between local government, community, and academic partners. A major learning from our engagement process is that climate adaptation interventions designed for climate-sensitive populations should incorporate structural changes to living environments and be codesigned with the community, with careful consideration to avoid maladaptive interventions that deepen existing injustices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Justice
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2024.0030
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building Partnerships to Identify and Address Wildfire Smoke and Extreme Heat Health Effects in Priority Populations

Alex Morrison, Michael Z. Liao, Germán Rodríguez Martínez, Winnie Yu et al.
1 links
Environmental Justice
Climate Change and Health Impacts
article

Building Partnerships to Identify and Address Wildfire Smoke and Extreme Heat Health Effects in Priority Populations

Alex Morrison, Michael Z. Liao, Germán Rodríguez Martínez, Winnie Yu, Neeta Thakur, Agustin Angel Bernabe, Andrew Nguyen, Leah Murphy
article en

Abstract

Background: The health impacts of extreme heat and wildfire smoke events are unevenly distributed; climate-sensitive populations are more exposed, more sensitive, and less likely to have the resources to respond. In this article, we describe the process of building a community-academic-local government partnership and conducting a climate survey with climate-sensitive populations to inform city-wide climate adaptation planning efforts in San Francisco, California. Materials and Methods: We formed a Community Stakeholder Group (CSG) with seven representatives from community organizations serving residents disproportionately affected by extreme climate weather events. The CSG identified priority populations, developed conceptual models, and developed and disseminated a climate survey. Results: CSG member engagement and satisfaction were high; 100% agreed that their opinions were valued and that they could talk openly. 95% and 98% of climate survey respondents ( n = 529) experienced at least one negative health outcome during extreme heat and wildfire smoke events, respectively. While 50%–75% of survey respondents implemented simple protective actions, the majority were unable to make substantial material and structural changes to their living environment that could significantly reduce their exposure to extreme heat and poor air quality. Major barriers included the high cost of repairs/materials, being a renter, and being unstably housed or unhoused. Conclusion: Our project is unique in the multi-stakeholder partnership formed between local government, community, and academic partners. A major learning from our engagement process is that climate adaptation interventions designed for climate-sensitive populations should incorporate structural changes to living environments and be codesigned with the community, with careful consideration to avoid maladaptive interventions that deepen existing injustices.

Environmental Justice
Stockholm Resilience Centre (SE), University of California, San Francisco (US), Seton Medical Center (US), Contra Costa County Library (US), New Leaders (US), Rafiki Coalition (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.