Service Delivery Models: Impacts for Students With and Without Disabilities

Students with and without disabilities may be educated across various service delivery models (SDMs): general education, cotaught, pull-out, and self-contained. Still, evidence for their relative effectiveness at scale remains limited. Using longitudinal administrative data from Indiana, we measured the effect of different SDMs on test scores, attendance, and disciplinary incidents. We leveraged within-student variation in SDM assignments and differences across students, applying student fixed effects and lagged outcomes models, which bound the causal effect within a narrow, policy-relevant range. Students with disabilities performed better in less restrictive environments, although the magnitude was often modest and varied across SDMs. Coteaching had a positive impact on students without disabilities. This work contributes to our understanding of inclusive practices’ effectiveness as experienced statewide.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Researcher
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x251316269
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Disability Education and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.10

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Service Delivery Models: Impacts for Students With and Without Disabilities

Lindsey Kaler, Marcus A. Winters, Jessica F. Markham‐Anderson, Josefina Senese et al.
3 citations
Educational Researcher
Disability Education and Employment
7.10
article

Service Delivery Models: Impacts for Students With and Without Disabilities

Lindsey Kaler, Marcus A. Winters, Jessica F. Markham‐Anderson, Josefina Senese, Nathan D. Jones
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Students with and without disabilities may be educated across various service delivery models (SDMs): general education, cotaught, pull-out, and self-contained. Still, evidence for their relative effectiveness at scale remains limited. Using longitudinal administrative data from Indiana, we measured the effect of different SDMs on test scores, attendance, and disciplinary incidents. We leveraged within-student variation in SDM assignments and differences across students, applying student fixed effects and lagged outcomes models, which bound the causal effect within a narrow, policy-relevant range. Students with disabilities performed better in less restrictive environments, although the magnitude was often modest and varied across SDMs. Coteaching had a positive impact on students without disabilities. This work contributes to our understanding of inclusive practices’ effectiveness as experienced statewide.

Educational ResearcherVol. 54(3)
William T. Grant Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Disability Education and Employment
7.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.