Data-Driven Adverse Pressure Gradient Correction for Turbulence Model

The Spalart–Allmaras (SA) model is widely used in engineering turbulence simulations. It has been calibrated using the logarithmic law and provides sufficient accuracy in zero pressure gradient (ZPG) turbulent boundary layer (TBL) but shows poor performance in the turbulence with adverse pressure gradient (APG), especially in separated flows. In this paper, the distribution of the important variables and functions of the SA model is studied. It is found that, in APG TBL, the original SA model exhibits significant errors and encounters a multiple-value problem of the [Formula: see text] function in the destruction term. A new feature is proposed based on the gradient of eddy viscosity to characterize the pressure gradient and history effects of TBL, overcoming the multiple-value problem. A new algebraic expression of the [Formula: see text] function, as shown in Eq. ( 21 ), is established by combining neural networks and symbolic regression. The results show that the new model provides good generalization for nine different flows outside the training set, not only maintaining the good behaviors of the original SA model in ZPG, but also enhancing the accuracy of separated flows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIAA Journal
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j064422
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.56

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data-Driven Adverse Pressure Gradient Correction for Turbulence Model

Weiwei Zhang, Xianglin Shan
11 citations
AIAA Journal
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
14.56
article

Data-Driven Adverse Pressure Gradient Correction for Turbulence Model

Weiwei Zhang, Xianglin Shan
article en
11 citations

Abstract

The Spalart–Allmaras (SA) model is widely used in engineering turbulence simulations. It has been calibrated using the logarithmic law and provides sufficient accuracy in zero pressure gradient (ZPG) turbulent boundary layer (TBL) but shows poor performance in the turbulence with adverse pressure gradient (APG), especially in separated flows. In this paper, the distribution of the important variables and functions of the SA model is studied. It is found that, in APG TBL, the original SA model exhibits significant errors and encounters a multiple-value problem of the [Formula: see text] function in the destruction term. A new feature is proposed based on the gradient of eddy viscosity to characterize the pressure gradient and history effects of TBL, overcoming the multiple-value problem. A new algebraic expression of the [Formula: see text] function, as shown in Eq. ( 21 ), is established by combining neural networks and symbolic regression. The results show that the new model provides good generalization for nine different flows outside the training set, not only maintaining the good behaviors of the original SA model in ZPG, but also enhancing the accuracy of separated flows.

AIAA JournalVol. 63(7)
Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
14.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Data-Driven Adverse Pressure Gradient Correction for Turbulence Model — Weiwei Zhang, Xianglin Shan · AIAA Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS