Development of a classification of anesthetic management methods and protocols for calculating financial costs

Background. The costs of anesthetic support represent a significant and essential component in the expense structure of medical services, diagnosis-related groups (DRGs), and high-tech medical care (HMC) that involve anesthesia. Consequently, there is a need to develop a unified methodology for calculating such costs, which ensures transparency and objectivity in the expense structure data. Developing appropriate protocols for each anesthesia method will enable their use in future calculations when updating and forming new medical services, DRG methods, and HMC that incorporate anesthesia. Objective: to standardize approaches to calculating costs of anesthetic support. Material and methods. The study was conducted in two stages. In the first stage, a classification (list) of anesthesia methods was developed for use in calculating the financial costs of anesthetic management. In the second stage, the structural and financial detailing of protocols for anesthesia methods was carried out in accordance with the classification. At each stage, the work of specialists from the Center for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control was validated by external experts, including anesthesiologists and intensivists. Results. The developed classification of anesthesia methods for calculating financial costs of anesthetic management, validated by external experts, included nine main methods. For each method, protocols were created for the first hour, the second, and each subsequent hour. These protocols facilitated the calculation of direct costs associated with providing anesthetic management, including labor costs for personnel directly involved in the medical service, costs of consumables, pharmaceuticals, depreciation, and indirect costs excluding the payroll of additional staff. The largest share of costs was attributed to consumables (over 50% for each anesthesia method). Additionally, calculations were made for indirect costs necessary to support the overall activities of medical organization. Conclusion. The developed protocols for each anesthesia method can be applied in future calculations when updating and forming new services and methods for DRGs and HMC that include anesthesia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FARMAKOEKONOMIKA Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology
Published
2025-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2024.288
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a classification of anesthetic management methods and protocols for calculating financial costs

V. V. Schukin, Д. С. Блинов, Andrei B. Abrosimov, И. Н. Пасечник et al.
FARMAKOEKONOMIKA Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

Development of a classification of anesthetic management methods and protocols for calculating financial costs

V. V. Schukin, Д. С. Блинов, Andrei B. Abrosimov, И. Н. Пасечник, D. V. Lukyantseva, V. V. Оmelyanovskiy, D. V. Fedyaev, J. A. Agafonova, S. A. Kovaleva
article en

Abstract

Background. The costs of anesthetic support represent a significant and essential component in the expense structure of medical services, diagnosis-related groups (DRGs), and high-tech medical care (HMC) that involve anesthesia. Consequently, there is a need to develop a unified methodology for calculating such costs, which ensures transparency and objectivity in the expense structure data. Developing appropriate protocols for each anesthesia method will enable their use in future calculations when updating and forming new medical services, DRG methods, and HMC that incorporate anesthesia. Objective: to standardize approaches to calculating costs of anesthetic support. Material and methods. The study was conducted in two stages. In the first stage, a classification (list) of anesthesia methods was developed for use in calculating the financial costs of anesthetic management. In the second stage, the structural and financial detailing of protocols for anesthesia methods was carried out in accordance with the classification. At each stage, the work of specialists from the Center for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control was validated by external experts, including anesthesiologists and intensivists. Results. The developed classification of anesthesia methods for calculating financial costs of anesthetic management, validated by external experts, included nine main methods. For each method, protocols were created for the first hour, the second, and each subsequent hour. These protocols facilitated the calculation of direct costs associated with providing anesthetic management, including labor costs for personnel directly involved in the medical service, costs of consumables, pharmaceuticals, depreciation, and indirect costs excluding the payroll of additional staff. The largest share of costs was attributed to consumables (over 50% for each anesthesia method). Additionally, calculations were made for indirect costs necessary to support the overall activities of medical organization. Conclusion. The developed protocols for each anesthesia method can be applied in future calculations when updating and forming new services and methods for DRGs and HMC that include anesthesia.

FARMAKOEKONOMIKA Modern Pharmacoeconomics and PharmacoepidemiologyVol. 17(4)
Central State Medical Academy (RU), Dmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology (RU), Federal State Budgetary Institution "Center for Expertise and Quality Control of Medical Care" (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.