National-Identitarian Politics: A Comparative Analysis of Putin, Trump, Orbán, and Bolsonaro's Reactionary Agendas

The paper politically characterizes the contemporary Far-right as a reactionary tendency, namely national-identitarian, by comparing the government policies of four ultra-conservative leaders: Putin (Russia), Trump (USA), Orbán (Hungary) and Bolsonaro (Brazil), who were selected for their governmental roles as leaders of this ideological bloc on four different continents. The comparative analysis relates government rhetoric and government measures in order to delineate their political strategy of gradually authoritarian reconversion of democracies to make them insensible to individuals and groups that differ from their conservative normative ideal, respectively characterized as: neo-Eurasian, (Russian), neo-nativist (American), neo-crusader (Hungarian) and violent social eugenism (Brazilian), by the author. From this perspective, the democratic response, as an alternative to the authoritarian involutions implemented, would consist of public policies that combine traditional and intentional differences (individual and social), including eventual evolutionary reforms of parliamentary representation to make it more permeable to them, in order to better harmonize the daily coexistence of different ways of life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Journal of Human-Social Science
Published
2025-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34257/gjhssfvol25is1pg1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Relations in Latin America
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

National-Identitarian Politics: A Comparative Analysis of Putin, Trump, Orbán, and Bolsonaro's Reactionary Agendas

J. Leite Lopes
1 citations
Global Journal of Human-Social Science
International Relations in Latin America
8.52
article

National-Identitarian Politics: A Comparative Analysis of Putin, Trump, Orbán, and Bolsonaro's Reactionary Agendas

J. Leite Lopes
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The paper politically characterizes the contemporary Far-right as a reactionary tendency, namely national-identitarian, by comparing the government policies of four ultra-conservative leaders: Putin (Russia), Trump (USA), Orbán (Hungary) and Bolsonaro (Brazil), who were selected for their governmental roles as leaders of this ideological bloc on four different continents. The comparative analysis relates government rhetoric and government measures in order to delineate their political strategy of gradually authoritarian reconversion of democracies to make them insensible to individuals and groups that differ from their conservative normative ideal, respectively characterized as: neo-Eurasian, (Russian), neo-nativist (American), neo-crusader (Hungarian) and violent social eugenism (Brazilian), by the author. From this perspective, the democratic response, as an alternative to the authoritarian involutions implemented, would consist of public policies that combine traditional and intentional differences (individual and social), including eventual evolutionary reforms of parliamentary representation to make it more permeable to them, in order to better harmonize the daily coexistence of different ways of life.

Global Journal of Human-Social Science
Instituto Universitário de Pesquisas do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Fundação Casa de Rui Barbosa (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
International Relations in Latin America
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.