Dynamics of anticancer drug use in Russian hospitals: a five-year retrospective analysis

Background. Pharmaceutical provision for oncology patients involves complex and controversial issues, particularly the use of oral anticancer drugs (ACDs) in day hospitals. These facilities often distribute oral medications for outpatient use, leading to frequent legal disputes with territorial Compulsory Health Insurance funds. To determine whether this practice changes over time, it is necessary to analyze trends in the use of ACDs. Objective: to identify trends in the use of different forms of ACDs in both inpatient and day hospital settings over a 5-year period. Material and methods . The study analyzed medical care provided in inpatient and day hospital settings using depersonalized hospitalization records from oncology-focused medical organizations. The data from 2019 to 2023 were categorized into three groups: regimens with only oral administration, including combinations of multiple oral drugs; regimens with only injectable forms, including intravenous and subcutaneous administration; and combined regimens, including oral and other forms of administration. The annual distribution and trends in the use of different forms of ACDs were analyzed for both inpatient and day hospital settings over the 5-year period. A time series analysis was carried out to assess the dynamics, including the calculation of absolute and relative growth (or decline) rates. Time series smoothing was performed using aggregation and moving average methods. Results. From 2019 to 2023, day hospitals in Russia exhibited an increase in the use of all ACD forms. The highest growth rate (79.9%) was observed for the use of oral therapy in 2020, with an overall increase from 9.25% to 29.09% over the study period. The combined regimens used in day hospitals demonstrated an increase in the proportion of oral therapy from 10.54% to 29.46%. However, inpatient settings exhibited a rise in the use of only injectable regimens from 17.65% to 23.32%. Conversely, the role of inpatient oral therapy significantly declined, with the proportion of oral-only and combined regimens decreasing from 43.59% to 1.18% and 30.47% to 12.95%, respectively. Conclusion . The results provide an evaluation of the trends in ACDs use in Russian hospitals. Despite an overall increase in the use of all ACD forms in day hospitals, oral medications exhibited the highest growth rate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FARMAKOEKONOMIKA Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology
Published
2025-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2024.277
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamics of anticancer drug use in Russian hospitals: a five-year retrospective analysis

V. V. Оmelyanovskiy, J. A. Agafonova
FARMAKOEKONOMIKA Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Dynamics of anticancer drug use in Russian hospitals: a five-year retrospective analysis

V. V. Оmelyanovskiy, J. A. Agafonova
article en

Abstract

Background. Pharmaceutical provision for oncology patients involves complex and controversial issues, particularly the use of oral anticancer drugs (ACDs) in day hospitals. These facilities often distribute oral medications for outpatient use, leading to frequent legal disputes with territorial Compulsory Health Insurance funds. To determine whether this practice changes over time, it is necessary to analyze trends in the use of ACDs. Objective: to identify trends in the use of different forms of ACDs in both inpatient and day hospital settings over a 5-year period. Material and methods . The study analyzed medical care provided in inpatient and day hospital settings using depersonalized hospitalization records from oncology-focused medical organizations. The data from 2019 to 2023 were categorized into three groups: regimens with only oral administration, including combinations of multiple oral drugs; regimens with only injectable forms, including intravenous and subcutaneous administration; and combined regimens, including oral and other forms of administration. The annual distribution and trends in the use of different forms of ACDs were analyzed for both inpatient and day hospital settings over the 5-year period. A time series analysis was carried out to assess the dynamics, including the calculation of absolute and relative growth (or decline) rates. Time series smoothing was performed using aggregation and moving average methods. Results. From 2019 to 2023, day hospitals in Russia exhibited an increase in the use of all ACD forms. The highest growth rate (79.9%) was observed for the use of oral therapy in 2020, with an overall increase from 9.25% to 29.09% over the study period. The combined regimens used in day hospitals demonstrated an increase in the proportion of oral therapy from 10.54% to 29.46%. However, inpatient settings exhibited a rise in the use of only injectable regimens from 17.65% to 23.32%. Conversely, the role of inpatient oral therapy significantly declined, with the proportion of oral-only and combined regimens decreasing from 43.59% to 1.18% and 30.47% to 12.95%, respectively. Conclusion . The results provide an evaluation of the trends in ACDs use in Russian hospitals. Despite an overall increase in the use of all ACD forms in day hospitals, oral medications exhibited the highest growth rate.

FARMAKOEKONOMIKA Modern Pharmacoeconomics and PharmacoepidemiologyVol. 17(4)
Financial Research (Hungary) (HU), Ministry of Health (HR), Federal State Budgetary Institution "Center for Expertise and Quality Control of Medical Care" (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.