Comparision of central retinal layer thickness in patients with PDR treated with intravitreal ranibizumab vs ranibizumab plus PRP

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the primary cause of blindness in the working population worldwide and is a common consequence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). One significant risk factor for serious vision loss in individuals with diabetes mellitus is retinal neovascularization (NV). Since the 1980s, retinal photocoagulation (PRP) has been the gold standard for treating diabetic retinopathy (DR) because it increases the availability of oxygen to the retina and reduces the subsequent release of vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF), which prevents the progression of diabetic retinopathy. Intravitreal anti VEGF therapy show combine anti-angiogenic and anti-edematous properties and significantly altered the course of DR. The purpose of this study is to assess the central retinal thickness (CRT) of eyes from patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) receiving intravitreal ranibizumab versus ranibizumab with pan retinal photocoagulation (PRP). : Thirty patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy were split into two groups for this prospective randomized control trial. Fifteen eyes in Group A received intravitreal ranibizumab, while fifteen eyes in Group B received intravitreal ranibizumab plus panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). The study was carried out over a six-month period. Using paired T tests and analysis of variance, visual acuity and central retinal thickness (CRT) were assessed at baseline, week 4, and week 8. : Best corrected visual acuity and Central Retinal thickness show a significant difference statistically (p value <0.05) between the two groups. Group A had a baseline visual acuity of 0.85 ± 0.10 compared to Group B 0.98 ± 0.14 with p value 0.007. By week 8, Group A showed a visual acuity of 0.34 ± 0.07 versus 0.26 ± 0.07 in Group B with p value 0.0012. Additionally, Group A's baseline CRT was 258.33 ± 20.33 µm compared to Group B's 267.40 ± 29.40 µm (p = 0.00002), and by week 8, it measured 217.26 ± 10.49 µm versus 228.00 ± 15.69 µm (p = 0.032). Compared to intravitreal ranibizumab alone, the combination of pan retinal photocoagulation with intravitreal ranibizumab is a more successful treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Central retinal thickness, macular edema, and neovascularization are reduced more significantly with combination therapy, potentially reducing the need for injections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Published
2025-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijceo.2025.020
Primary Topic
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparision of central retinal layer thickness in patients with PDR treated with intravitreal ranibizumab vs ranibizumab plus PRP

Undrakonda Vivekanand, Chandana Priyadarsini Eluri, Anudeep Kannegolla
4 links
Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
article

Comparision of central retinal layer thickness in patients with PDR treated with intravitreal ranibizumab vs ranibizumab plus PRP

Undrakonda Vivekanand, Chandana Priyadarsini Eluri, Anudeep Kannegolla
article en

Abstract

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the primary cause of blindness in the working population worldwide and is a common consequence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). One significant risk factor for serious vision loss in individuals with diabetes mellitus is retinal neovascularization (NV). Since the 1980s, retinal photocoagulation (PRP) has been the gold standard for treating diabetic retinopathy (DR) because it increases the availability of oxygen to the retina and reduces the subsequent release of vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF), which prevents the progression of diabetic retinopathy. Intravitreal anti VEGF therapy show combine anti-angiogenic and anti-edematous properties and significantly altered the course of DR. The purpose of this study is to assess the central retinal thickness (CRT) of eyes from patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) receiving intravitreal ranibizumab versus ranibizumab with pan retinal photocoagulation (PRP). : Thirty patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy were split into two groups for this prospective randomized control trial. Fifteen eyes in Group A received intravitreal ranibizumab, while fifteen eyes in Group B received intravitreal ranibizumab plus panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). The study was carried out over a six-month period. Using paired T tests and analysis of variance, visual acuity and central retinal thickness (CRT) were assessed at baseline, week 4, and week 8. : Best corrected visual acuity and Central Retinal thickness show a significant difference statistically (p value <0.05) between the two groups. Group A had a baseline visual acuity of 0.85 ± 0.10 compared to Group B 0.98 ± 0.14 with p value 0.007. By week 8, Group A showed a visual acuity of 0.34 ± 0.07 versus 0.26 ± 0.07 in Group B with p value 0.0012. Additionally, Group A's baseline CRT was 258.33 ± 20.33 µm compared to Group B's 267.40 ± 29.40 µm (p = 0.00002), and by week 8, it measured 217.26 ± 10.49 µm versus 228.00 ± 15.69 µm (p = 0.032). Compared to intravitreal ranibizumab alone, the combination of pan retinal photocoagulation with intravitreal ranibizumab is a more successful treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Central retinal thickness, macular edema, and neovascularization are reduced more significantly with combination therapy, potentially reducing the need for injections.

Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental OphthalmologyVol. 11(1)
Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.