Large Quantities of Bacterial DNA and Protein in Common Dietary Protein Source Used in Microbiome Studies

Diet has been shown to greatly impact the intestinal microbiota. To understand the role of individual dietary components, defined diets with purified components are frequently used in diet-microbiota studies. Defined diets frequently use purified casein as the protein source. Previous work indicated that casein contains microbial DNA potentially impacting results of microbiome studies. Other diet-based microbially derived molecules that may impact microbiome measurements, such as proteins detected by metaproteomics, have not been determined for casein. Additionally, other protein sources used in microbiome studies have not been characterized for their microbial content. We used metagenomics and metaproteomics to identify and quantify microbial DNA and protein in a casein-based defined diet to better understand potential impacts on metagenomic and metaproteomic microbiome studies. We further tested six additional defined diets with purified protein sources with an integrated metagenomic-metaproteomic approach and found that contaminating microbial protein is unique to casein within the tested set as microbial protein was not identified in diets with other protein sources. We also illustrate the contribution of diet-derived microbial protein in diet-microbiota studies by metaproteomic analysis of stool samples from germ-free mice (GF) and mice with a conventional microbiota (CV) following consumption of diets with casein and non-casein protein. This study highlights a potentially confounding factor in diet-microbiota studies that must be considered through evaluation of the diet itself within a given study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PROTEOMICS
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.202400149
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Gut microbiota and health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Large Quantities of Bacterial DNA and Protein in Common Dietary Protein Source Used in Microbiome Studies

Manuel Kleiner, Alexandria Bartlett, Casey M. Theriot, Tanner Richie et al.
4 citations
PROTEOMICS
Gut microbiota and health
3.22
article

Large Quantities of Bacterial DNA and Protein in Common Dietary Protein Source Used in Microbiome Studies

Manuel Kleiner, Alexandria Bartlett, Casey M. Theriot, Tanner Richie, J. Alfredo Blakeley‐Ruiz
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Diet has been shown to greatly impact the intestinal microbiota. To understand the role of individual dietary components, defined diets with purified components are frequently used in diet-microbiota studies. Defined diets frequently use purified casein as the protein source. Previous work indicated that casein contains microbial DNA potentially impacting results of microbiome studies. Other diet-based microbially derived molecules that may impact microbiome measurements, such as proteins detected by metaproteomics, have not been determined for casein. Additionally, other protein sources used in microbiome studies have not been characterized for their microbial content. We used metagenomics and metaproteomics to identify and quantify microbial DNA and protein in a casein-based defined diet to better understand potential impacts on metagenomic and metaproteomic microbiome studies. We further tested six additional defined diets with purified protein sources with an integrated metagenomic-metaproteomic approach and found that contaminating microbial protein is unique to casein within the tested set as microbial protein was not identified in diets with other protein sources. We also illustrate the contribution of diet-derived microbial protein in diet-microbiota studies by metaproteomic analysis of stool samples from germ-free mice (GF) and mice with a conventional microbiota (CV) following consumption of diets with casein and non-casein protein. This study highlights a potentially confounding factor in diet-microbiota studies that must be considered through evaluation of the diet itself within a given study.

PROTEOMICSVol. 25(17-18)
North Carolina State University (US), Duke University (US)
North Carolina State University, Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research, National Institutes of Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Gut microbiota and health
3.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.