Flow Control Devices for Aeroacoustic Noise Suppression in Cavity Flow

Minimizing a radar cross-section during the design phase of advanced combat aircraft is crucial for enhancing battlefield survivability. Modern stealth aircraft, in contrast to traditional designs, use internal weapon bays, creating complex flow environments influenced by aeroacoustics, fluid–structure interaction, bay wall resonance, and pitch-up moments during ejection. This study employs numerical simulations using the M219 cavity model, integrating passive and active flow control devices to investigate aeroacoustic noise suppression and cavity flow control. The findings reveal that noise suppression is primarily achieved by displacing the shear layer away from the cavity opening, reducing energy transfer into the cavity, and mitigating vortex–pressure interactions. The passive leading-edge-inclined–trailing-edge-slanted integration model effectively suppresses Rossiter modes from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] narrowband tones, while the active jet flow model achieves suppression at [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] but is less effective for broadband noise. Conversely, the negative leading-edge jet flow model shows limited noise suppression capabilities. These results provide critical insights into the effectiveness of diverse flow control strategies in managing cavity flow and aeroacoustic noise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Aircraft
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c038014
Primary Topic
Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flow Control Devices for Aeroacoustic Noise Suppression in Cavity Flow

Kim Boon Lua, S. Lee
Journal of Aircraft
Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
article

Flow Control Devices for Aeroacoustic Noise Suppression in Cavity Flow

Kim Boon Lua, S. Lee
article en

Abstract

Minimizing a radar cross-section during the design phase of advanced combat aircraft is crucial for enhancing battlefield survivability. Modern stealth aircraft, in contrast to traditional designs, use internal weapon bays, creating complex flow environments influenced by aeroacoustics, fluid–structure interaction, bay wall resonance, and pitch-up moments during ejection. This study employs numerical simulations using the M219 cavity model, integrating passive and active flow control devices to investigate aeroacoustic noise suppression and cavity flow control. The findings reveal that noise suppression is primarily achieved by displacing the shear layer away from the cavity opening, reducing energy transfer into the cavity, and mitigating vortex–pressure interactions. The passive leading-edge-inclined–trailing-edge-slanted integration model effectively suppresses Rossiter modes from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] narrowband tones, while the active jet flow model achieves suppression at [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] but is less effective for broadband noise. Conversely, the negative leading-edge jet flow model shows limited noise suppression capabilities. These results provide critical insights into the effectiveness of diverse flow control strategies in managing cavity flow and aeroacoustic noise.

Journal of AircraftVol. 62(5)
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.