Soil fauna in agroforestry contributes to the suppressiveness to plant-parasitic nematodes: A case study in a Mediterranean area

Plant-parasitic nematodes are known to impair plant development and can cause severe crop loss. Agroforestry is a promising land use management system for the preservation of soil fertility and biodiversity conservation, but very few studies have focused on the regulation of plant-parasitic nematodes with the inclusion of tree alleys in cropping systems. In this study, the capacity of the soil to suppress plant-parasitic nematodes was assessed in Southern France. Fresh and heated soils from different combinations of land use (monospecific crop, agroforestry or tree plantation) and plant cover (crop or tree) were tested for their capacity to suppress Meloidogyne javanica in a laboratory assay. In the samples taken under tree cover, the suppressive capacity of fresh soils was improved compared to that of the monospecific crop samples. As the suppressive capacity of the heated soils remained low, we considered that soil fauna was responsible for part of the soil suppressiveness. The characterization of nematode communities revealed no Meloidogyne spp. on the experimental site, but other plant-parasitic nematodes were found. The total density of Pratylenchus spp. was lower while the relative density of Helicotylenchus spp. was higher under tree cover, compared with the monospecific crop soils. In agroforestry, the relative density of herbivores was ca 200 % higher under tree cover compared to under crop cover but the parasitic pressure (assessed by the Plant-Parasitic Index/Maturity Index ratio) was ca 30 % lower. Moreover, the crop soils had the highest Enrichment Index while the tree row soils in agroforestry had the highest Structural Index. The suppressive capacity in agroforestry was associated with a specific nematofauna, including more predatory taxa than in the monospecific crop. This study showed that including trees in a cropping system in a Mediterranean area created a favorable niche for potential herbivore regulators among the soil fauna. Further investigations are required to validate the regulation of plant-parasitic nematodes, and to disentangle the complex interactions explaining it in agroforestry. • Suppressiveness to M. javanica was higher in the soils under tree cover. • Soil fauna contributed to this suppressive capacity. • This suppressive capacity was associated with a specific nematofauna. • The parasitic pressure was lower under tree cover in agroforestry. • Agroforestry is a promising management system to regulate root herbivores.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Soil Ecology
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.105962
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Nematode management and characterization studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Soil fauna in agroforestry contributes to the suppressiveness to plant-parasitic nematodes: A case study in a Mediterranean area

Anne-Sophie Masson, Jamel Aribi, Stéphane Bellafiore, Claire Marsden et al.
4 citations
Applied Soil Ecology
Nematode management and characterization studies
7.00
article

Soil fauna in agroforestry contributes to the suppressiveness to plant-parasitic nematodes: A case study in a Mediterranean area

Anne-Sophie Masson, Jamel Aribi, Stéphane Bellafiore, Claire Marsden, Mickaël Hedde, Jean Trap, Fanny Bouton
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Plant-parasitic nematodes are known to impair plant development and can cause severe crop loss. Agroforestry is a promising land use management system for the preservation of soil fertility and biodiversity conservation, but very few studies have focused on the regulation of plant-parasitic nematodes with the inclusion of tree alleys in cropping systems. In this study, the capacity of the soil to suppress plant-parasitic nematodes was assessed in Southern France. Fresh and heated soils from different combinations of land use (monospecific crop, agroforestry or tree plantation) and plant cover (crop or tree) were tested for their capacity to suppress Meloidogyne javanica in a laboratory assay. In the samples taken under tree cover, the suppressive capacity of fresh soils was improved compared to that of the monospecific crop samples. As the suppressive capacity of the heated soils remained low, we considered that soil fauna was responsible for part of the soil suppressiveness. The characterization of nematode communities revealed no Meloidogyne spp. on the experimental site, but other plant-parasitic nematodes were found. The total density of Pratylenchus spp. was lower while the relative density of Helicotylenchus spp. was higher under tree cover, compared with the monospecific crop soils. In agroforestry, the relative density of herbivores was ca 200 % higher under tree cover compared to under crop cover but the parasitic pressure (assessed by the Plant-Parasitic Index/Maturity Index ratio) was ca 30 % lower. Moreover, the crop soils had the highest Enrichment Index while the tree row soils in agroforestry had the highest Structural Index. The suppressive capacity in agroforestry was associated with a specific nematofauna, including more predatory taxa than in the monospecific crop. This study showed that including trees in a cropping system in a Mediterranean area created a favorable niche for potential herbivore regulators among the soil fauna. Further investigations are required to validate the regulation of plant-parasitic nematodes, and to disentangle the complex interactions explaining it in agroforestry. • Suppressiveness to M. javanica was higher in the soils under tree cover. • Soil fauna contributed to this suppressive capacity. • This suppressive capacity was associated with a specific nematofauna. • The parasitic pressure was lower under tree cover in agroforestry. • Agroforestry is a promising management system to regulate root herbivores.

Applied Soil EcologyVol. 208
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), Institute of Technology of Cambodia (KH), Université de Montpellier (FR), Agropolis International (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Ecologie fonctionnelle & biogéochimie des sols & des agro-systèmes (FR), Institut Agro Montpelier (FR), Services déconcentrés d'appui à la recherche Occitanie-Montpellier (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Plant Health Institute de Montpellier (FR)
Fondation de France
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Nematode management and characterization studies
7.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.