Cross-validation of the WAIS-IV Similarities incidental learning task

The incidental learning index based on Similarities subtest (IL-Sim) from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Test-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) has shown promise as a screening measure for memory impairment. We aimed to examine the reliability, convergent and divergent validity, and the utility of IL-Sim index in classifying at least mild and severe memory impairment. One hundred and fifty-three Veterans completed the WAIS-IV Similarities subtest and Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) as part of their clinical evaluations. IL-Sim had acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's <i>α</i> = .85). Among RBANS indices, IL-Sim had the largest association with the Delayed Memory Index (<i>r</i> = .69), followed by the Immediate Memory Index (<i>r</i> = .59), and relatively smaller associations with non-memory indices (<i>r</i>s = .26-.38). For both younger (ages 40-69) and older (ages 70-87) adults, IL-Sim had excellent discriminability between patients without memory problems and those with at least mildly or severely impaired RBANS memory (AUC = .83-.87). To enhance the ease of interpretation for IL-Sim scores, we presented logistic regression-derived probabilities across multiple base rates for each age group and impairment severity. IL-Sim showed strong convergent and divergent validity and discriminated along the memory impairment continuum highlighting its promise as an efficient screening measure of memory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Neuropsychology Adult
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2466187
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-validation of the WAIS-IV Similarities incidental learning task

Dustin B. Hammers, Amber D. Rochette, Sarah D. Patrick, Brian D. Gradwohl et al.
1 citations
Applied Neuropsychology Adult
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
1.47
article

Cross-validation of the WAIS-IV Similarities incidental learning task

Dustin B. Hammers, Amber D. Rochette, Sarah D. Patrick, Brian D. Gradwohl, Andrew C. Hale, Robert J. Spencer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The incidental learning index based on Similarities subtest (IL-Sim) from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Test-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) has shown promise as a screening measure for memory impairment. We aimed to examine the reliability, convergent and divergent validity, and the utility of IL-Sim index in classifying at least mild and severe memory impairment. One hundred and fifty-three Veterans completed the WAIS-IV Similarities subtest and Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) as part of their clinical evaluations. IL-Sim had acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's <i>α</i> = .85). Among RBANS indices, IL-Sim had the largest association with the Delayed Memory Index (<i>r</i> = .69), followed by the Immediate Memory Index (<i>r</i> = .59), and relatively smaller associations with non-memory indices (<i>r</i>s = .26-.38). For both younger (ages 40-69) and older (ages 70-87) adults, IL-Sim had excellent discriminability between patients without memory problems and those with at least mildly or severely impaired RBANS memory (AUC = .83-.87). To enhance the ease of interpretation for IL-Sim scores, we presented logistic regression-derived probabilities across multiple base rates for each age group and impairment severity. IL-Sim showed strong convergent and divergent validity and discriminated along the memory impairment continuum highlighting its promise as an efficient screening measure of memory.

Applied Neuropsychology Adult
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System (US), Michigan Medicine (US), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.