Evaluation of a self-report distress measure in a high-secure forensic population: CORE-OM psychometric properties and test structure

The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) is a widely adopted routine patient reported outcome measures across the National Health Service mental health services, including some forensic mental health services. Yet little is known about the measurement properties of the CORE-OM for forensic patients. This study examined the psychometric properties and structure of the CORE-OM in a sample of high-secure forensic patients. T-tests confirmed forensic patients’ scores fall between non-clinical and clinical normative scores. Internal consistency of the overall scale was high, though some score domains demonstrated poor reliability. Principal component analysis revealed a unique three-component structure underlying the CORE-OM items, related to life-functioning and self-worth, relational difficulties, and risk of harm to self. The findings highlight limitations to the generalisability of the original CORE-OM measurement properties to a forensic population. Further research on the CORE-OM is critical given its continued routine use in forensic mental health services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2025.2468291
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of a self-report distress measure in a high-secure forensic population: CORE-OM psychometric properties and test structure

Natasha Purcell, Lindsay Thomson, Lindsey Gilling, Kerr Hartop
1 citations
Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
2.31
article

Evaluation of a self-report distress measure in a high-secure forensic population: CORE-OM psychometric properties and test structure

Natasha Purcell, Lindsay Thomson, Lindsey Gilling, Kerr Hartop
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) is a widely adopted routine patient reported outcome measures across the National Health Service mental health services, including some forensic mental health services. Yet little is known about the measurement properties of the CORE-OM for forensic patients. This study examined the psychometric properties and structure of the CORE-OM in a sample of high-secure forensic patients. T-tests confirmed forensic patients’ scores fall between non-clinical and clinical normative scores. Internal consistency of the overall scale was high, though some score domains demonstrated poor reliability. Principal component analysis revealed a unique three-component structure underlying the CORE-OM items, related to life-functioning and self-worth, relational difficulties, and risk of harm to self. The findings highlight limitations to the generalisability of the original CORE-OM measurement properties to a forensic population. Further research on the CORE-OM is critical given its continued routine use in forensic mental health services.

Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and PsychologyVol. 36(3)
State Hospital (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of a self-report distress measure in a high-secure forensic population: CORE-OM psychometric properties and test structure — Natasha Purcell, Lindsay Thomson, et al. · Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS