Re-evaluating the labor market effects of occupational licensing: Longitudinal evidence across states

We present new data on regulatory restrictions across states and occupations between 2017 and 2022 to study the labor market effects of occupational licensing. First, we document three stylized facts: (a) regulatory restrictions across states and occupations have grown by nearly a factor of three since 2019, (b) increases in regulatory restrictions are concentrated in occupations with lower median hourly wages and higher within-occupation inequality, and (c) states that expanded regulatory restrictions tend to have lower GOP vote shares. Second, exploiting variation across occupations within the same state-year, we find that a 10% rise in regulatory restrictions leads to a 2% rise in hourly wages, but a 4% decline in employment. Both the employment and wage effects are concentrated in lower wage jobs, as well as among respondents with professional licenses, even after controlling for differences across industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04497-5
Primary Topic
Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Re-evaluating the labor market effects of occupational licensing: Longitudinal evidence across states

Patrick A. McLaughlin, Christos Makridis
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
article

Re-evaluating the labor market effects of occupational licensing: Longitudinal evidence across states

Patrick A. McLaughlin, Christos Makridis
article en

Abstract

We present new data on regulatory restrictions across states and occupations between 2017 and 2022 to study the labor market effects of occupational licensing. First, we document three stylized facts: (a) regulatory restrictions across states and occupations have grown by nearly a factor of three since 2019, (b) increases in regulatory restrictions are concentrated in occupations with lower median hourly wages and higher within-occupation inequality, and (c) states that expanded regulatory restrictions tend to have lower GOP vote shares. Second, exploiting variation across occupations within the same state-year, we find that a 10% rise in regulatory restrictions leads to a 2% rise in hourly wages, but a 4% decline in employment. Both the employment and wage effects are concentrated in lower wage jobs, as well as among respondents with professional licenses, even after controlling for differences across industry.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Hoover Institution (US), University of Nicosia (CY), Arizona State University (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Re-evaluating the labor market effects of occupational licensing: Longitudinal evidence across states — Patrick A. McLaughlin, Christos Makridis · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS