A comparison of traditional face-to-face and remote administration of auditory attention and executive functioning measures in a cohort of clinically-referred pediatric patients

<b>Objective:</b> During the COVID-19 pandemic, teleneuropsychology (teleNP) practice was quickly adopted to afford continuity of clinical care, however, the teleNP literature in children remains limited and focused on specific clinical populations and/or select test measures. Notably, attention and executive functioning are commonly assessed in neuropsychological assessments of patients with medical conditions, psychological, or educational concerns, yet few studies have offered support for teleNP administration of measures targeting these cognitive domains in children. <b>Method:</b> This cross-sectional study involved a retrospective chart review of pediatric patients who underwent an in-person neuropsychological evaluation at an academic medical center before the pandemic (<i>N</i> = 287) or videoconference teleNP assessment during the pandemic (<i>N</i> = 277). The assessment battery included a test of intellectual functioning and measures indexing sustained attention or executive functioning (inhibition, set-shifting, concept formation). <b>Results:</b> No effect of test modality was seen across measures of sustained attention, shifting, and abstract reasoning. TeleNP testing yielded lower inhibition, switching, and divided attention scores than in-person testing, a pattern that was observed among those with anxiety. In contrast, no effect of test modality was seen in those without anxiety. <b>Conclusions:</b> Although findings provide evidence of equivalence between remote and in-person testing for select auditory and executive functioning measures, results highlight the importance of considering anxiety. TeleNP can be an important assessment modality to expand accessibility for youth with medical and psychological concerns, however, more research is necessary to determine specific tools that are diagnostically sensitive across test modalities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Clinical Neuropsychologist
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2025.2469338
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison of traditional face-to-face and remote administration of auditory attention and executive functioning measures in a cohort of clinically-referred pediatric patients

Rowena Ng, Rachel K. Peterson
2 citations
The Clinical Neuropsychologist
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
2.94
article

A comparison of traditional face-to-face and remote administration of auditory attention and executive functioning measures in a cohort of clinically-referred pediatric patients

Rowena Ng, Rachel K. Peterson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> During the COVID-19 pandemic, teleneuropsychology (teleNP) practice was quickly adopted to afford continuity of clinical care, however, the teleNP literature in children remains limited and focused on specific clinical populations and/or select test measures. Notably, attention and executive functioning are commonly assessed in neuropsychological assessments of patients with medical conditions, psychological, or educational concerns, yet few studies have offered support for teleNP administration of measures targeting these cognitive domains in children. <b>Method:</b> This cross-sectional study involved a retrospective chart review of pediatric patients who underwent an in-person neuropsychological evaluation at an academic medical center before the pandemic (<i>N</i> = 287) or videoconference teleNP assessment during the pandemic (<i>N</i> = 277). The assessment battery included a test of intellectual functioning and measures indexing sustained attention or executive functioning (inhibition, set-shifting, concept formation). <b>Results:</b> No effect of test modality was seen across measures of sustained attention, shifting, and abstract reasoning. TeleNP testing yielded lower inhibition, switching, and divided attention scores than in-person testing, a pattern that was observed among those with anxiety. In contrast, no effect of test modality was seen in those without anxiety. <b>Conclusions:</b> Although findings provide evidence of equivalence between remote and in-person testing for select auditory and executive functioning measures, results highlight the importance of considering anxiety. TeleNP can be an important assessment modality to expand accessibility for youth with medical and psychological concerns, however, more research is necessary to determine specific tools that are diagnostically sensitive across test modalities.

The Clinical NeuropsychologistVol. 39(5)
Kennedy Krieger Institute (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
2.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.