Comparison of traction vs. snare as rescue methods for challenging colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Propensity score-matched study

Utilizing a traction device as a rescue technique in difficult colorectal ESD resulted in higher en bloc and R0 resection rates compared with conversion to snare resection. Initiating traction within 75 minutes may contribute to reducing overall procedure time for challenging colorectal ESD cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endoscopy International Open
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2544-3279
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of traction vs. snare as rescue methods for challenging colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Propensity score-matched study

Takuya Iwama, Seisuke Saito, Keitaro Takahashi, Momotaro Muto et al.
Endoscopy International Open
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Comparison of traction vs. snare as rescue methods for challenging colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Propensity score-matched study

Takuya Iwama, Seisuke Saito, Keitaro Takahashi, Momotaro Muto, Nobuhiro Ueno, Mikihiro Fujiya, Shohei Kuroda, Shin Kashima, Hiroki Tanabe, Kentaro Moriichi, Katsuyoshi Ando, Kazuyuki Tanaka, M. Horiuchi, Yuki Miyazawa
article en

Abstract

Utilizing a traction device as a rescue technique in difficult colorectal ESD resulted in higher en bloc and R0 resection rates compared with conversion to snare resection. Initiating traction within 75 minutes may contribute to reducing overall procedure time for challenging colorectal ESD cases.

Endoscopy International OpenVol. 13(CP)
Asahikawa Medical University (JP), Sapporo Higashi Tokushukai Hospital (JP), Asahikawa City Hospital (JP), Nayoro City General Hospital (JP), Sapporo Kosei General Hospital (JP), Japanese Red Cross Asahikawa Hospital (JP), Asahikawa Kosei Hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.