Conversion from Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches to Open Surgery Among Patients with Endometrial Cancer in the SGO Clinical Outcomes Registry

The adoption of MIS has become increasingly common standard of care for managing EC, attributed to enhanced perioperative outcomes. Factors associated with conversion such as uterine size, prior abdominal surgeries, surgical complexity, disease extent, and histologic types can affect the surgeon's choice. Ultimately, a personalized surgical approach, tailored to individual patient attributes, remains pivotal for optimizing outcomes in EC management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-16949-y
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conversion from Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches to Open Surgery Among Patients with Endometrial Cancer in the SGO Clinical Outcomes Registry

Abdelrahman Yousif, Summer Dewdney, Julie Ngo, Jenny LaChance et al.
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

Conversion from Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches to Open Surgery Among Patients with Endometrial Cancer in the SGO Clinical Outcomes Registry

Abdelrahman Yousif, Summer Dewdney, Julie Ngo, Jenny LaChance, J. Michael Straughn, Benjamin Mize, Patrick Timmins, Rodney P. Rocconi, Deena M. Abdelgadir, Jason A. Lachance, IIana Chefetz
article en

Abstract

The adoption of MIS has become increasingly common standard of care for managing EC, attributed to enhanced perioperative outcomes. Factors associated with conversion such as uterine size, prior abdominal surgeries, surgical complexity, disease extent, and histologic types can affect the surgeon's choice. Ultimately, a personalized surgical approach, tailored to individual patient attributes, remains pivotal for optimizing outcomes in EC management.

Annals of Surgical OncologyVol. 32(5)
Texas Tech University (US), Rush University Medical Center (US), Maine Medical Center (US), Mercer University (US), Wayne State University (US), Hurley Medical Center (US), Jackson Memorial Hospital (US), Henry Ford Hospital (US), University of Mississippi Medical Center (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), The Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute (US), University of Michigan–Flint (US), MaineHealth (US), CancerCare (US), ProHealth Care (US), Michigan State University (US), Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Conversion from Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches to Open Surgery Among Patients with Endometrial Cancer in the SGO Clinical Outcomes Registry — Abdelrahman Yousif, Summer Dewdney, et al. · Annals of Surgical Oncology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS