Analysis Study of Diagnostic Imaging Performance and Accuracy of Kidney Stone : A Comprehensive Systematic Review

Background: Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis/urolithiasis) are a prevalent urological condition caused by crystallization of minerals in the urinary tract. Their formation can lead to pain, hematuria, infections, and renal dysfunction if untreated. The increasing incidence of nephrolithiasis is linked to dietary habits, metabolic disorders, dehydration, and obesity. Imaging is crucial for early diagnosis and management, guiding treatment options such as conservative management, medical expulsive therapy, or surgical interventions. Objective: This systematic review aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of various imaging modalities—ultrasound (US), non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT), contrast-enhanced CT, dual-energy CT (DECT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and KUB X-ray—in detecting and characterizing kidney stones. Methods: The study follows PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Peer-reviewed studies published from 2015–2025 were identified through searches in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus. Inclusion criteria encompass studies assessing imaging performance in nephrolithiasis, with sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values as primary outcomes. Results: After screening, eight relevant studies were included. Ultrasonography, while radiation-free and cost-effective, has lower sensitivity than NCCT, the gold standard for kidney stone diagnosis due to its high accuracy. Dual-energy CT improves stone composition characterization, while MRI offers a radiation-free alternative but is less sensitive in detecting calcified stones. Conclusion: Imaging techniques vary in sensitivity and specificity for nephrolithiasis diagnosis. NCCT remains the most accurate, while US is preferred for radiation-sensitive populations. MRI may serve as a secondary tool where radiation exposure is a concern. Future advancements in imaging technology may further refine nephrolithiasis detection and characterization.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70070/mt5f1s38
Primary Topic
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis Study of Diagnostic Imaging Performance and Accuracy of Kidney Stone : A Comprehensive Systematic Review

Haekal Mahargias, Febrina Mayasari Gunawan
The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
article

Analysis Study of Diagnostic Imaging Performance and Accuracy of Kidney Stone : A Comprehensive Systematic Review

Haekal Mahargias, Febrina Mayasari Gunawan
article en

Abstract

Background: Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis/urolithiasis) are a prevalent urological condition caused by crystallization of minerals in the urinary tract. Their formation can lead to pain, hematuria, infections, and renal dysfunction if untreated. The increasing incidence of nephrolithiasis is linked to dietary habits, metabolic disorders, dehydration, and obesity. Imaging is crucial for early diagnosis and management, guiding treatment options such as conservative management, medical expulsive therapy, or surgical interventions. Objective: This systematic review aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of various imaging modalities—ultrasound (US), non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT), contrast-enhanced CT, dual-energy CT (DECT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and KUB X-ray—in detecting and characterizing kidney stones. Methods: The study follows PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Peer-reviewed studies published from 2015–2025 were identified through searches in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus. Inclusion criteria encompass studies assessing imaging performance in nephrolithiasis, with sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values as primary outcomes. Results: After screening, eight relevant studies were included. Ultrasonography, while radiation-free and cost-effective, has lower sensitivity than NCCT, the gold standard for kidney stone diagnosis due to its high accuracy. Dual-energy CT improves stone composition characterization, while MRI offers a radiation-free alternative but is less sensitive in detecting calcified stones. Conclusion: Imaging techniques vary in sensitivity and specificity for nephrolithiasis diagnosis. NCCT remains the most accurate, while US is preferred for radiation-sensitive populations. MRI may serve as a secondary tool where radiation exposure is a concern. Future advancements in imaging technology may further refine nephrolithiasis detection and characterization.

The International Journal of Medical Science and Health ResearchVol. 9(5)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.