The Criminal Framework for Mental Deception: Controlling Consciousness

The paper examines some aspects of the legal constructs of mental deception and control over it in the Criminal Codes. Therefore, this research adopts the modest aim of providing an in-depth analysis of how the Criminal Codes go about the business of mental deception in five ways: defining mental deception, the historical development of mental deception, the role of mens rea and knowledge, comparison between different codes, and future legal reform. The research, using a qualitative methodology of case study and legal text analyses, reveals the extent to which the state of practice falls short in current laws. While there continues to be more acceptance of mental deception in the law, much disparity among jurisdictions and, particularly, reforms are urgently needed, this paper concludes that the disparate definitions call for a single, unifying definition in statute law and that there should be admissibility of evidence relating to expertise on psychology for due consideration of such cases in legal proceedings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ecohumanism
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.6099
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Criminal Framework for Mental Deception: Controlling Consciousness

Mohamed Fathi Shehta Ibrahim Diab, Gamal Sayed Khalifa Mohamed, Faris Mohammed Albati, Mohammed Albkjaji et al.
Journal of Ecohumanism
Deception detection and forensic psychology
article

The Criminal Framework for Mental Deception: Controlling Consciousness

Mohamed Fathi Shehta Ibrahim Diab, Gamal Sayed Khalifa Mohamed, Faris Mohammed Albati, Mohammed Albkjaji, Muhammad bin Saud Al-Shammari
article en

Abstract

The paper examines some aspects of the legal constructs of mental deception and control over it in the Criminal Codes. Therefore, this research adopts the modest aim of providing an in-depth analysis of how the Criminal Codes go about the business of mental deception in five ways: defining mental deception, the historical development of mental deception, the role of mens rea and knowledge, comparison between different codes, and future legal reform. The research, using a qualitative methodology of case study and legal text analyses, reveals the extent to which the state of practice falls short in current laws. While there continues to be more acceptance of mental deception in the law, much disparity among jurisdictions and, particularly, reforms are urgently needed, this paper concludes that the disparate definitions call for a single, unifying definition in statute law and that there should be admissibility of evidence relating to expertise on psychology for due consideration of such cases in legal proceedings.

Journal of EcohumanismVol. 3(8)
Prince Sultan University (SA), University of Ha'il (SA), College of Law (LV)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.