Inka Numbers, Khipu, and Yupana: a Reanalysis

Abstract We review the history of decipherment on the technologies used for numbers by the Inkas – khipus and yupanas . We offer a novel interpretation of the portable “checkerboard” yupana drawn in 1615, revealing a numerical algorithm. This analysis sheds new light on the Inka number system, questioning its inclusion of a concept of zero and its interpretation as a positional system. We conclude that Inka numbers and computational methods were likely non-positional, analogous to Mesopotamian, Egyptian, Greek, and Roman numbers. We show the Inka multiplication method as similar to – but more efficient than – the Egyptian method in the Rhind Papyrus. This analysis shows the Inka number system to have ranked among the great mathematical traditions of the ancient world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cognition and Culture
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12340204
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inka Numbers, Khipu, and Yupana: a Reanalysis

Karenleigh A. Overmann, Cinzia Florio
3 citations
Journal of Cognition and Culture
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
9.08
article

Inka Numbers, Khipu, and Yupana: a Reanalysis

Karenleigh A. Overmann, Cinzia Florio
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract We review the history of decipherment on the technologies used for numbers by the Inkas – khipus and yupanas . We offer a novel interpretation of the portable “checkerboard” yupana drawn in 1615, revealing a numerical algorithm. This analysis sheds new light on the Inka number system, questioning its inclusion of a concept of zero and its interpretation as a positional system. We conclude that Inka numbers and computational methods were likely non-positional, analogous to Mesopotamian, Egyptian, Greek, and Roman numbers. We show the Inka multiplication method as similar to – but more efficient than – the Egyptian method in the Rhind Papyrus. This analysis shows the Inka number system to have ranked among the great mathematical traditions of the ancient world.

Journal of Cognition and CultureVol. 25(1-2)
University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
9.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.