Maine de Biran

Abstract Why do we still persist today in describing Maine de Biran’s thought as “spiritualist,” even though it sets materialism and spiritualism back-to-back as speculative systems – already present in embryonic form within Cartesian doctrine – that run counter to inner experience and the true science of humankind? This article revisits the genesis of the discovery of a force that, according to its author, alone proves truly capable of grasping the feeling of effort or sense of self, something that no prior metaphysical or physiological explanation had succeeded in articulating. Such a force is not spiritual if by “spiritual” we mean a force divorced from all matter and any physiological conditions of its realization. Consequently, as Biran repeatedly insists, all discussions of spiritualism and materialism revolve around the ambiguity between the self ( moi ) and the soul ( âme ). To be a philosopher of consciousness, must one be a spiritualist?

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for Continental Philosophy of Religion
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/25889613-bja10080
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Historical Philosophy and Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maine de Biran

Anne Devarieux, Victor Emma-Adamah
1 citations
Journal for Continental Philosophy of Religion
Historical Philosophy and Science
article

Maine de Biran

Anne Devarieux, Victor Emma-Adamah
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Why do we still persist today in describing Maine de Biran’s thought as “spiritualist,” even though it sets materialism and spiritualism back-to-back as speculative systems – already present in embryonic form within Cartesian doctrine – that run counter to inner experience and the true science of humankind? This article revisits the genesis of the discovery of a force that, according to its author, alone proves truly capable of grasping the feeling of effort or sense of self, something that no prior metaphysical or physiological explanation had succeeded in articulating. Such a force is not spiritual if by “spiritual” we mean a force divorced from all matter and any physiological conditions of its realization. Consequently, as Biran repeatedly insists, all discussions of spiritualism and materialism revolve around the ambiguity between the self ( moi ) and the soul ( âme ). To be a philosopher of consciousness, must one be a spiritualist?

Journal for Continental Philosophy of ReligionVol. 7(1)
Institut catholique de toulouse (FR), Normandie Université (FR), Université de Caen Normandie (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Historical Philosophy and Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Maine de Biran — Anne Devarieux, Victor Emma-Adamah · Journal for Continental Philosophy of Religion (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS