Conversational Polarization: Eight Key Considerations for Communication Scientists

Previous research has largely overlooked how polarization is constituted through conversations. We introduce the concept of “conversational polarization,” highlighting how polarization is socially constructed in conversations about contentious issues. We present eight considerations for communication scientists to study polarization. Theoretical considerations include: (a) positioning research within the interactional paradigm, (b) considering interlocutors’ responses to speakers’ conversational contributions, (c) uncovering moralities, and (d) identifying conversational turning points. Methodological considerations involve (e) focusing on everyday conversations, (f) linking micro- to macro-level analyses, and (g) noting pitch, facial expressions, and arousal. Finally, concerning societal considerations, we recommend (h) eliciting participant feedback.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Communication
Published
2025-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470251314726
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conversational Polarization: Eight Key Considerations for Communication Scientists

Christel W. van Eck, Lotte van Burgsteden
1 citations
Science Communication
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
15.18
article

Conversational Polarization: Eight Key Considerations for Communication Scientists

Christel W. van Eck, Lotte van Burgsteden
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Previous research has largely overlooked how polarization is constituted through conversations. We introduce the concept of “conversational polarization,” highlighting how polarization is socially constructed in conversations about contentious issues. We present eight considerations for communication scientists to study polarization. Theoretical considerations include: (a) positioning research within the interactional paradigm, (b) considering interlocutors’ responses to speakers’ conversational contributions, (c) uncovering moralities, and (d) identifying conversational turning points. Methodological considerations involve (e) focusing on everyday conversations, (f) linking micro- to macro-level analyses, and (g) noting pitch, facial expressions, and arousal. Finally, concerning societal considerations, we recommend (h) eliciting participant feedback.

Science CommunicationVol. 48(2)
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
15.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.