Detection and comparative analysis of VOCs between tomato and pepper based on GC×GC-TOFMS

This study aimed to identify and compare the flavor substances in mature tomato and pepper fruits using flavoromics based on GC×GC-TOF-MS. A total of 1560 volatile substances were identified, including 627 tomato specific substances and 534 pepper specific substances. Esters were identified as the distinguishing factor in the aroma profiles of the two. ROAV, an effective flavor evaluation criterion, can help identify the main contributors to flavor that can be detected by the taste buds. VOCs with ROAV > 1 are typically regarded as the key flavor contributors. Interestingly, it was found that tomato and pepper shared three common VOCs (2-nonenal, (E)-; 2-octenal, (E)-; and furan, 2-pentyl-.), which exhibited higher ROAV in both. Except for the three common VOCs, heptanal; 2-dodecenal, (E)-; 1-octen-3-one; 2-undecanone in tomato and pyrazine, 2-methoxy-3-(2-methylpropyl)- in pepper were identified to be contributive to their corresponding aromatic flavor (ROVA > 1), respectively. The contents of 138 volatile metabolites differ between tomato and pepper. Among them, acetoin, dodecanal and 1-decanol demonstrated highest fold change (Log<sub>2</sub>FC > 10). The flavor wheel shows the most obvious flavor characteristic of both tomato and pepper is sweet flavor. In addition, green, fruity, herbal, woody and apple flavors are prominent in pepper, while waxy, citrus and fatty flavors are prominent in tomato.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90796-5
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detection and comparative analysis of VOCs between tomato and pepper based on GC×GC-TOFMS

Rongqing Wang, Hongjian Wan, Shangjing Guo, Chenxu Liu et al.
5 citations
Scientific Reports
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
3.37
article

Detection and comparative analysis of VOCs between tomato and pepper based on GC×GC-TOFMS

Rongqing Wang, Hongjian Wan, Shangjing Guo, Chenxu Liu, Zhuping Yao, Sihui Guan, Yuan Cheng, Meiying Ruan, Guozhi Zhou, QingjingYe
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to identify and compare the flavor substances in mature tomato and pepper fruits using flavoromics based on GC×GC-TOF-MS. A total of 1560 volatile substances were identified, including 627 tomato specific substances and 534 pepper specific substances. Esters were identified as the distinguishing factor in the aroma profiles of the two. ROAV, an effective flavor evaluation criterion, can help identify the main contributors to flavor that can be detected by the taste buds. VOCs with ROAV > 1 are typically regarded as the key flavor contributors. Interestingly, it was found that tomato and pepper shared three common VOCs (2-nonenal, (E)-; 2-octenal, (E)-; and furan, 2-pentyl-.), which exhibited higher ROAV in both. Except for the three common VOCs, heptanal; 2-dodecenal, (E)-; 1-octen-3-one; 2-undecanone in tomato and pyrazine, 2-methoxy-3-(2-methylpropyl)- in pepper were identified to be contributive to their corresponding aromatic flavor (ROVA > 1), respectively. The contents of 138 volatile metabolites differ between tomato and pepper. Among them, acetoin, dodecanal and 1-decanol demonstrated highest fold change (Log<sub>2</sub>FC > 10). The flavor wheel shows the most obvious flavor characteristic of both tomato and pepper is sweet flavor. In addition, green, fruity, herbal, woody and apple flavors are prominent in pepper, while waxy, citrus and fatty flavors are prominent in tomato.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Shihezi University (CN), Qingdao Agricultural University (CN), ZheJiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), Peng Cheng Laboratory (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
3.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.