Quantifying the Impact of Oxidative Treatments on Electrode Overpotentials in the All‐Vanadium Redox Flow Battery

Abstract Despite the commercialization of flow batteries, little is known about how much electrode treatment methods affect individual electrode overpotential contributions. Thermal oxidation is one of the most common electrode treatment methods in literature, which has increased the energy efficiencies of vanadium redox flow batteries (VRFBs) by 10 to 20 % depending on their operating current density. However, it is unclear how much electrode overpotential remains after these treatments, which is critical to identifying viable pathways for further improvement. Herein, we demonstrate how membrane‐based reference electrodes provide an opportunity to examine individual electrode overpotentials during operation to gain deeper insights into their role in battery performance. Without oxidative treatments, negative electrode overpotential contributions range from 150 to 250 mV depending on the operating current density, overshadowing positive electrode contributions. Use of oxidative treatment reduced negative electrode contributions by nearly 50 % percent from their initial values but marginally increased positive electrode overpotential values. Treating the negative electrode while leaving the positive electrode untreated resulted in the best performance observed but still had 150 to 300 mV of electrode overpotentials remaining, suggesting that additional electrode improvements can still provide significant gains in energy efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ChemElectroChem
Published
2025-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.202400620
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced battery technologies research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying the Impact of Oxidative Treatments on Electrode Overpotentials in the All‐Vanadium Redox Flow Battery

Abdullah O. Khan, Derek M. Hall, Peter Samora Owuor, Ridge M. Bachman
1 citations
ChemElectroChem
Advanced battery technologies research
0.73
article

Quantifying the Impact of Oxidative Treatments on Electrode Overpotentials in the All‐Vanadium Redox Flow Battery

Abdullah O. Khan, Derek M. Hall, Peter Samora Owuor, Ridge M. Bachman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Despite the commercialization of flow batteries, little is known about how much electrode treatment methods affect individual electrode overpotential contributions. Thermal oxidation is one of the most common electrode treatment methods in literature, which has increased the energy efficiencies of vanadium redox flow batteries (VRFBs) by 10 to 20 % depending on their operating current density. However, it is unclear how much electrode overpotential remains after these treatments, which is critical to identifying viable pathways for further improvement. Herein, we demonstrate how membrane‐based reference electrodes provide an opportunity to examine individual electrode overpotentials during operation to gain deeper insights into their role in battery performance. Without oxidative treatments, negative electrode overpotential contributions range from 150 to 250 mV depending on the operating current density, overshadowing positive electrode contributions. Use of oxidative treatment reduced negative electrode contributions by nearly 50 % percent from their initial values but marginally increased positive electrode overpotential values. Treating the negative electrode while leaving the positive electrode untreated resulted in the best performance observed but still had 150 to 300 mV of electrode overpotentials remaining, suggesting that additional electrode improvements can still provide significant gains in energy efficiency.

ChemElectroChemVol. 12(7)
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Advanced battery technologies research
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.