Instability and uncertainty of carbon storage in karst regions under land use change: a case study in Guiyang, China

Introduction Karst regions are integral to the global carbon cycle. However, land use changes of karst regions driven by urbanization and desertification contribute to the instability of carbon storage, leading to uncertainties in the future. Understanding these instabilities and uncertainties is crucial for formulating carbon sequestration and land management strategies. Methods This study employed Patch-generating Land Use Simulation (PLUS) and Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs (InVEST) to estimate carbon storage, and introduced the Coefficient of Variation (CV) to assess the instability and uncertainty. Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) was applied to explore the mechanisms, while Polynomial Regression (PR) identified the stable intervals of factors, informing land-use policies. Results and Discussion (1) From 2000 to 2020, Guiyang’s carbon storage rose from 136.62 Tg to 142.13 Tg. By 2035, projections under natural development, urban expansion, and ecological protection scenarios estimate increases to 147.50 Tg, 147.40 Tg, and 147.82 Tg, respectively. (2) Carbon storage instability increased from 2000 to 2020, while uncertainty is expected to decrease by 2035. Instability was primarily due to transitions of Cropland-Forest, Forest-Cropland, Cropland-Grassland, and Cropland-Impervious, while uncertainties mainly arise from Cropland-Forest, Cropland-Impervious, and Grassland-Impervious transitions. (3) DEM, AI, Distance from national highways, SHDI, and Mean annual precipitation affected instability significantly. (4) Encouraging Shrub-Forest, Shrub-Cropland and Cropland-Forest conversions, and controlling Forest-Cropland, Forest-Shrub, and Cropland-Impervious conversions within the stable intervals of factors, can enhance carbon storage and reduce uncertainty. This study establishes a methodology for evaluating carbon storage instability and uncertainty in karst regions, which is an extension of carbon storage research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1551050
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Cryospheric studies and observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Instability and uncertainty of carbon storage in karst regions under land use change: a case study in Guiyang, China

Jinting Zhang, Yiqun Yu, Heng Zhou, Jingnan Huang et al.
5 citations
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Cryospheric studies and observations
6.50
article

Instability and uncertainty of carbon storage in karst regions under land use change: a case study in Guiyang, China

Jinting Zhang, Yiqun Yu, Heng Zhou, Jingnan Huang, Jun Huang, Mingdong Tang, Haijuan Zhao
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Introduction Karst regions are integral to the global carbon cycle. However, land use changes of karst regions driven by urbanization and desertification contribute to the instability of carbon storage, leading to uncertainties in the future. Understanding these instabilities and uncertainties is crucial for formulating carbon sequestration and land management strategies. Methods This study employed Patch-generating Land Use Simulation (PLUS) and Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs (InVEST) to estimate carbon storage, and introduced the Coefficient of Variation (CV) to assess the instability and uncertainty. Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) was applied to explore the mechanisms, while Polynomial Regression (PR) identified the stable intervals of factors, informing land-use policies. Results and Discussion (1) From 2000 to 2020, Guiyang’s carbon storage rose from 136.62 Tg to 142.13 Tg. By 2035, projections under natural development, urban expansion, and ecological protection scenarios estimate increases to 147.50 Tg, 147.40 Tg, and 147.82 Tg, respectively. (2) Carbon storage instability increased from 2000 to 2020, while uncertainty is expected to decrease by 2035. Instability was primarily due to transitions of Cropland-Forest, Forest-Cropland, Cropland-Grassland, and Cropland-Impervious, while uncertainties mainly arise from Cropland-Forest, Cropland-Impervious, and Grassland-Impervious transitions. (3) DEM, AI, Distance from national highways, SHDI, and Mean annual precipitation affected instability significantly. (4) Encouraging Shrub-Forest, Shrub-Cropland and Cropland-Forest conversions, and controlling Forest-Cropland, Forest-Shrub, and Cropland-Impervious conversions within the stable intervals of factors, can enhance carbon storage and reduce uncertainty. This study establishes a methodology for evaluating carbon storage instability and uncertainty in karst regions, which is an extension of carbon storage research.

Frontiers in Environmental ScienceVol. 13
Jianghan University (CN), Wuhan University (CN), Wuhan Municipal Engineering Design & Research Institute (CN), Guangdong Urban & Rural Planning and Design Institute (CN), Wuhan University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Cryospheric studies and observations
6.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.