Embodied and dis-embodied affordances in mathematics education

In this paper, we discuss a two-way mechanism for acquiring mathematical knowledge: dis-embodied-to-embodied and embodied-to-dis-embodied shifts. Shifting from an embodied representation to a dis-embodied representation enables mathematics learners to discover general rules and patterns that can be applied to a wide range of mathematical problems, while shifting from a dis-embodied representation to an embodied representation allows mathematics learners to acquire a more graspable knowledge of mathematics. After discussing these two shifts in mode of processing, we describe a two-way mechanism through which a parallel employment of these two modes of thought allows mathematics learners to acquire a grounded and deep knowledge of mathematics. Therefore, any mathematics education program should engage learners in both modes of processing. Finally, we conclude that it is not possible to have an efficient education program by focusing on just one mode of mathematical thought.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1528755
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Embodied and dis-embodied affordances in mathematics education

Omid Khatin‐Zadeh, Danyal Farsani
1 citations
Frontiers in Education
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
11.32
article

Embodied and dis-embodied affordances in mathematics education

Omid Khatin‐Zadeh, Danyal Farsani
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss a two-way mechanism for acquiring mathematical knowledge: dis-embodied-to-embodied and embodied-to-dis-embodied shifts. Shifting from an embodied representation to a dis-embodied representation enables mathematics learners to discover general rules and patterns that can be applied to a wide range of mathematical problems, while shifting from a dis-embodied representation to an embodied representation allows mathematics learners to acquire a more graspable knowledge of mathematics. After discussing these two shifts in mode of processing, we describe a two-way mechanism through which a parallel employment of these two modes of thought allows mathematics learners to acquire a grounded and deep knowledge of mathematics. Therefore, any mathematics education program should engage learners in both modes of processing. Finally, we conclude that it is not possible to have an efficient education program by focusing on just one mode of mathematical thought.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
11.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.