Feeding habits of sympatric aoudad (<i>Ammotragus lervia</i>) and desert bighorn sheep (<i>Ovis canadensis mexicana</i>) in West Texas

Abstract Aoudad ( Ammotragus lervia ), native to northern Africa, were introduced as exotic game animals to the Chihuahuan Desert in West Texas, USA, and have become invasive. Aoudad and bighorn sheep ( Ovis canadensis mexicana ) are adapted to rugged terrain in arid climates, and both persist in desert regions with low primary productivity and limited perennial water availability, which suggests potential for competition for food and water resources. Aoudad are highly adaptable, which could make them more resilient to a changing environment with extreme conditions, providing a competitive edge over bighorn sheep. To evaluate the potential for exploitative competition between invasive aoudad and endemic desert bighorn sheep, we used genetic metabarcoding to assess diet composition using fecal samples collected from adults of each species in the Sierra Vieja Mountains in West Texas. We collected 32 composite samples from aoudad and 27 composite samples for bighorn sheep and identified 88 genera consumed. Bighorn sheep and aoudad diets (as inferred by genera) were most different during the warm‐wet season (16 June–15 October; Kulczynski similarity index = 0.81) and most similar during the warm‐dry season (16 February–15 June; Kulczynski similarity index = 1.05). During the warm‐wet season, the 2 herbivores tended to consume different genera, suggesting the possibility of resource partitioning, with less likelihood of resource partitioning during the warm‐dry season when forage was more limited and diets were similar. Diet diversity, measured by Shannon's diversity index, did not vary substantially between species, but for aoudad it was highest during the warm‐wet season (1.1 ± 0.0.1 [SE]) and lowest during the cool‐dry season (16 October–15 February, 0.9 ± 0.0.1). For bighorn sheep, diet richness was highest during the cool‐dry season (1.1 ± 0.2) and lowest during the warm‐dry season (0.8 ± 0.10). Bighorn sheep may specialize on high‐quality forage species, particularly during the warm‐wet season, while aoudad have a more generalist foraging strategy, although temporal windows for increased competition for food resources likely occur. Aoudad are well‐adapted to low‐quality forage and arid climates, which could increase their competitive ability and compromise bighorn sheep conservation efforts in areas of sympatry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Wildlife Management
Published
2025-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.70008
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feeding habits of sympatric aoudad (Ammotragus lervia) and desert bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis mexicana) in West Texas

Louis A. Harveson, Ryan O’Shaughnessy, James W. Cain, Grace L. Parikh et al.
1 citations
Journal of Wildlife Management
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
article

Feeding habits of sympatric aoudad (Ammotragus lervia) and desert bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis mexicana) in West Texas

Louis A. Harveson, Ryan O’Shaughnessy, James W. Cain, Grace L. Parikh, Jose L. Etchart
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Aoudad ( Ammotragus lervia ), native to northern Africa, were introduced as exotic game animals to the Chihuahuan Desert in West Texas, USA, and have become invasive. Aoudad and bighorn sheep ( Ovis canadensis mexicana ) are adapted to rugged terrain in arid climates, and both persist in desert regions with low primary productivity and limited perennial water availability, which suggests potential for competition for food and water resources. Aoudad are highly adaptable, which could make them more resilient to a changing environment with extreme conditions, providing a competitive edge over bighorn sheep. To evaluate the potential for exploitative competition between invasive aoudad and endemic desert bighorn sheep, we used genetic metabarcoding to assess diet composition using fecal samples collected from adults of each species in the Sierra Vieja Mountains in West Texas. We collected 32 composite samples from aoudad and 27 composite samples for bighorn sheep and identified 88 genera consumed. Bighorn sheep and aoudad diets (as inferred by genera) were most different during the warm‐wet season (16 June–15 October; Kulczynski similarity index = 0.81) and most similar during the warm‐dry season (16 February–15 June; Kulczynski similarity index = 1.05). During the warm‐wet season, the 2 herbivores tended to consume different genera, suggesting the possibility of resource partitioning, with less likelihood of resource partitioning during the warm‐dry season when forage was more limited and diets were similar. Diet diversity, measured by Shannon's diversity index, did not vary substantially between species, but for aoudad it was highest during the warm‐wet season (1.1 ± 0.0.1 [SE]) and lowest during the cool‐dry season (16 October–15 February, 0.9 ± 0.0.1). For bighorn sheep, diet richness was highest during the cool‐dry season (1.1 ± 0.2) and lowest during the warm‐dry season (0.8 ± 0.10). Bighorn sheep may specialize on high‐quality forage species, particularly during the warm‐wet season, while aoudad have a more generalist foraging strategy, although temporal windows for increased competition for food resources likely occur. Aoudad are well‐adapted to low‐quality forage and arid climates, which could increase their competitive ability and compromise bighorn sheep conservation efforts in areas of sympatry.

Journal of Wildlife ManagementVol. 89(4)
New Mexico State University (US), United States Geological Survey (US), Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (US), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US), Sul Ross State University (US)
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.