War Crimes and Legal Accountability in the 2023 Israel-Gaza Conflict

Hamas's use of armed force against Israel precipitated a large-scale war. Both Israel and Palestine suffered significant losses, including civilian casualties and damage to civilian infrastructure. Given these events, it is crucial to assess the violations committed by both sides to offer recommendations for international alignment and post-conflict resolution efforts. This research examines visual and written online news coverage of war events during the conflict's first ten days, along with international responses. The study aims to evaluate potential violations committed by Israel and Hamas according to jus in bello principles, drawing from both international agreements and customary international law. Furthermore, this research will assess the international community's legitimacy regarding parties perpetuating the destruction. This research found that both Hamas and Israel have violated international law. Specifically, they violated jus in bello (humanitarian law), and Hamas additionally violated jus ad bellum (the law of aggression). Conversely, Israel's actions in self-defense are considered illegal. As a result of these violations, both Hamas and Israel could potentially be held accountable before the International Criminal Court.KEYWORDS: International law, Justice of war, Israel-Palestine dispute, Use of force.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Lentera Hukum
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v11i3.3546
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

War Crimes and Legal Accountability in the 2023 Israel-Gaza Conflict

Lindra Darnela, Erma Rusdiana, Rabiatul Adawiah, Arif Sugitanata
1 citations
Lentera Hukum
International Law and Human Rights
2.23
article

War Crimes and Legal Accountability in the 2023 Israel-Gaza Conflict

Lindra Darnela, Erma Rusdiana, Rabiatul Adawiah, Arif Sugitanata
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Hamas's use of armed force against Israel precipitated a large-scale war. Both Israel and Palestine suffered significant losses, including civilian casualties and damage to civilian infrastructure. Given these events, it is crucial to assess the violations committed by both sides to offer recommendations for international alignment and post-conflict resolution efforts. This research examines visual and written online news coverage of war events during the conflict's first ten days, along with international responses. The study aims to evaluate potential violations committed by Israel and Hamas according to jus in bello principles, drawing from both international agreements and customary international law. Furthermore, this research will assess the international community's legitimacy regarding parties perpetuating the destruction. This research found that both Hamas and Israel have violated international law. Specifically, they violated jus in bello (humanitarian law), and Hamas additionally violated jus ad bellum (the law of aggression). Conversely, Israel's actions in self-defense are considered illegal. As a result of these violations, both Hamas and Israel could potentially be held accountable before the International Criminal Court.KEYWORDS: International law, Justice of war, Israel-Palestine dispute, Use of force.

Lentera HukumVol. 11(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
International Law and Human Rights
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.