Use of mechanical insufflation–exsufflation devices among intensive care units in Brazil

Despite its potential benefits, it is unclear how professionals use mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) in Brazilian intensive care units (ICUs). This survey aimed to describe MI-E use among health care professionals registered with the Brazilian Association of Intensive Care. Cross-sectional electronic survey of health care professionals (physicians, physiotherapists and nurses) registered with the Brazilian Association of Intensive Care. A total of 232 surveys were returned. An MI-E device was available in 20.9% of ICUs. Even in these ICUs, the use of MI-E was infrequent (daily, 12.9%; weekly, 22.6%; monthly or less, 64.5%). Lack of knowledge, inadequate resources and lack of scientific evidence were reported as barriers to the regular use of MI-E. MI-E was not widely adopted in Brazilian ICUs, and the range of reported barriers warrants further investigation. Results of this study highlighted the low utilization of MI-E by health care professionals, including nurses, working in ICUs in Brazil. Lack of knowledge and supportive scientific evidence were identified as significant barriers to implementation and use. These barriers can be addressed through controlled clinical trials and team training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing in Critical Care
Published
2025-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.13269
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.55

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of mechanical insufflation–exsufflation devices among intensive care units in Brazil

Maycon Moura Reboredo, Bruno Valle Pinheiro, Leonardo Vieira Nunes, Cristiane Bastos Netto et al.
1 citations
Nursing in Critical Care
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
1.55
article

Use of mechanical insufflation–exsufflation devices among intensive care units in Brazil

Maycon Moura Reboredo, Bruno Valle Pinheiro, Leonardo Vieira Nunes, Cristiane Bastos Netto, Rodrigo Souza Vieira, Erich Vidal Carvalho
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Despite its potential benefits, it is unclear how professionals use mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) in Brazilian intensive care units (ICUs). This survey aimed to describe MI-E use among health care professionals registered with the Brazilian Association of Intensive Care. Cross-sectional electronic survey of health care professionals (physicians, physiotherapists and nurses) registered with the Brazilian Association of Intensive Care. A total of 232 surveys were returned. An MI-E device was available in 20.9% of ICUs. Even in these ICUs, the use of MI-E was infrequent (daily, 12.9%; weekly, 22.6%; monthly or less, 64.5%). Lack of knowledge, inadequate resources and lack of scientific evidence were reported as barriers to the regular use of MI-E. MI-E was not widely adopted in Brazilian ICUs, and the range of reported barriers warrants further investigation. Results of this study highlighted the low utilization of MI-E by health care professionals, including nurses, working in ICUs in Brazil. Lack of knowledge and supportive scientific evidence were identified as significant barriers to implementation and use. These barriers can be addressed through controlled clinical trials and team training.

Nursing in Critical CareVol. 30(2)
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (BR)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
1.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.