Turbine- and farm-scale power losses in wind farms: an alternative to wake and farm blockage losses

Abstract. Turbine–wake and farm–atmosphere interactions can reduce wind farm power production. To model farm performance, it is important to understand the impact of different flow effects on the farm efficiency (i.e. farm power normalised by the power of the same number of isolated turbines). In this study we analyse the results of 43 large-eddy simulations (LESs) of wind farms in a range of conventionally neutral boundary layers (CNBLs). First, we show that the farm efficiency ηf is not well correlated with the wake efficiency ηw (i.e. farm power normalised by the power of front-row turbines). This suggests that existing metrics, classifying the loss of farm power into wake loss and farm blockage loss, are not best suited for understanding large wind farm performance. We then evaluate the assumption of scale separation in the two-scale momentum theory (Nishino and Dunstan, 2020) using the LES results. Building upon this theory, we propose two new metrics for wind farm performance: turbine-scale efficiency ηTS, reflecting the losses due to turbine–wake interactions, and farm-scale efficiency ηFS, indicating the losses due to farm–atmosphere interactions. The LES results show that ηTS is insensitive to the atmospheric condition, whereas ηFS is insensitive to the turbine layout. Finally, we show that a recently developed analytical wind farm model predicts ηFS with an average error of 5.7 % from the LES results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wind energy science
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-435-2025
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Wind Energy Research and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.97

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Turbine- and farm-scale power losses in wind farms: an alternative to wake and farm blockage losses

Luca Lanzilao, Thomas D. Dunstan, Johan Meyers, Takafumi Nishino et al.
4 citations
Wind energy science
Wind Energy Research and Development
19.97
article

Turbine- and farm-scale power losses in wind farms: an alternative to wake and farm blockage losses

Luca Lanzilao, Thomas D. Dunstan, Johan Meyers, Takafumi Nishino, Andrew Kirby
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Turbine–wake and farm–atmosphere interactions can reduce wind farm power production. To model farm performance, it is important to understand the impact of different flow effects on the farm efficiency (i.e. farm power normalised by the power of the same number of isolated turbines). In this study we analyse the results of 43 large-eddy simulations (LESs) of wind farms in a range of conventionally neutral boundary layers (CNBLs). First, we show that the farm efficiency ηf is not well correlated with the wake efficiency ηw (i.e. farm power normalised by the power of front-row turbines). This suggests that existing metrics, classifying the loss of farm power into wake loss and farm blockage loss, are not best suited for understanding large wind farm performance. We then evaluate the assumption of scale separation in the two-scale momentum theory (Nishino and Dunstan, 2020) using the LES results. Building upon this theory, we propose two new metrics for wind farm performance: turbine-scale efficiency ηTS, reflecting the losses due to turbine–wake interactions, and farm-scale efficiency ηFS, indicating the losses due to farm–atmosphere interactions. The LES results show that ηTS is insensitive to the atmospheric condition, whereas ηFS is insensitive to the turbine layout. Finally, we show that a recently developed analytical wind farm model predicts ηFS with an average error of 5.7 % from the LES results.

Wind energy scienceVol. 10(2)
Met Office (GB), University of Oxford (GB), KU Leuven (BE)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Natural Environment Research Council, HORIZON EUROPE Climate, Energy and Mobility
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Wind Energy Research and Development
19.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.