Exploring the causes of sunk cost fallacy in the construction industry: case of mega projects

Purpose This study aims to reveal the main causes of the sunk cost fallacy in construction projects. Thus, it is expected that sunk costs can be avoided, which have a big impact on construction costs. Design/methodology/approach The construction industry is fragmented and dynamic. Therefore, it is vulnerable to several risks such as time, cost and labor-related risks. The complexity and fragmented nature of construction projects brings up the need for high financial investment funds. In some cases, this results in sunk costs that cannot be recovered. A considerable amount of sunk costs occurs due to the sunk cost fallacy meaning that construction practitioners feel responsible for completing the projects despite unsuccessful project performance indicators due to various reasons such as client pressure, restricting regulations and the need to develop a good reputation considering future projects. However, the sunk cost fallacy can sometimes result in irrecoverable losses, which can badly affect a firm’s reputation regarding future projects. Findings In this respect, a total of 207 industry practitioners were surveyed to determine the main causes of the sunk cost fallacy. The causes were then ranked based on the order of importance, and weights were assigned for each cause determined. Concerning such ranking and weighting, the most essential causes were revealed. Moreover, the study presents a total of 4 case studies, which are mega projects that came up with sunk costs. The cases are presented to support the main causes of the sunk cost fallacy exploring from which the sunk cost fallacy stems. Originality/value The lack of research on sunk cost fallacy in the construction industry makes this study novel in the fact that a large sample provides data regarding the causes of sunk cost fallacy. The findings of this study can guide both industry practitioners and policymakers in terms of developing strategies to avoid sunk costs and experience higher success rates in their projects.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Construction & Architectural Management
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-10-2024-1322
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Public-Private Partnership Projects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the causes of sunk cost fallacy in the construction industry: case of mega projects

Sevilay Demirkesen
1 citations
Engineering Construction & Architectural Management
Public-Private Partnership Projects
2.23
article

Exploring the causes of sunk cost fallacy in the construction industry: case of mega projects

Sevilay Demirkesen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to reveal the main causes of the sunk cost fallacy in construction projects. Thus, it is expected that sunk costs can be avoided, which have a big impact on construction costs. Design/methodology/approach The construction industry is fragmented and dynamic. Therefore, it is vulnerable to several risks such as time, cost and labor-related risks. The complexity and fragmented nature of construction projects brings up the need for high financial investment funds. In some cases, this results in sunk costs that cannot be recovered. A considerable amount of sunk costs occurs due to the sunk cost fallacy meaning that construction practitioners feel responsible for completing the projects despite unsuccessful project performance indicators due to various reasons such as client pressure, restricting regulations and the need to develop a good reputation considering future projects. However, the sunk cost fallacy can sometimes result in irrecoverable losses, which can badly affect a firm’s reputation regarding future projects. Findings In this respect, a total of 207 industry practitioners were surveyed to determine the main causes of the sunk cost fallacy. The causes were then ranked based on the order of importance, and weights were assigned for each cause determined. Concerning such ranking and weighting, the most essential causes were revealed. Moreover, the study presents a total of 4 case studies, which are mega projects that came up with sunk costs. The cases are presented to support the main causes of the sunk cost fallacy exploring from which the sunk cost fallacy stems. Originality/value The lack of research on sunk cost fallacy in the construction industry makes this study novel in the fact that a large sample provides data regarding the causes of sunk cost fallacy. The findings of this study can guide both industry practitioners and policymakers in terms of developing strategies to avoid sunk costs and experience higher success rates in their projects.

Engineering Construction & Architectural Management
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Public-Private Partnership Projects
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring the causes of sunk cost fallacy in the construction industry: case of mega projects — Sevilay Demirkesen · Engineering Construction & Architectural Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS