Measuring the value of water quality improvements for recreation use on an urban river: a travel cost contingent behavior approach

Abstract We estimate the value of water quality improvements for recreational activities on and near the Brandywine Creek in Delaware. We divide water-based recreational activities into two groups: water-contact and non-water-contact. We then consider the behavioral change of the recreationists in each group when faced with water quality improvements posed in a stated preference (contingent behavior) survey. We use five common physical attributes of water quality in the contingent behavior analysis: water clarity, catch rate of fish, safety of eating fish, safety for swimming, and ecological health. The survey was constructed in such a way that each of these attributes of water quality is valued. The per-trip value for water quality improvements ranged from $4 to $63 for contact use and from $4 to $29 for non-contact use depending on which and how many attributes of water quality improve. Even though we measure sizable benefits, rough cost estimates appear to make it difficult for incremental improvements to exceed costs unless attribute improvement is widespread.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/age.2024.9
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring the value of water quality improvements for recreation use on an urban river: a travel cost contingent behavior approach

George R. Parsons, Joy Deep Chakrabartty
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review
Economic and Environmental Valuation
article

Measuring the value of water quality improvements for recreation use on an urban river: a travel cost contingent behavior approach

George R. Parsons, Joy Deep Chakrabartty
article en

Abstract

Abstract We estimate the value of water quality improvements for recreational activities on and near the Brandywine Creek in Delaware. We divide water-based recreational activities into two groups: water-contact and non-water-contact. We then consider the behavioral change of the recreationists in each group when faced with water quality improvements posed in a stated preference (contingent behavior) survey. We use five common physical attributes of water quality in the contingent behavior analysis: water clarity, catch rate of fish, safety of eating fish, safety for swimming, and ecological health. The survey was constructed in such a way that each of these attributes of water quality is valued. The per-trip value for water quality improvements ranged from $4 to $63 for contact use and from $4 to $29 for non-contact use depending on which and how many attributes of water quality improve. Even though we measure sizable benefits, rough cost estimates appear to make it difficult for incremental improvements to exceed costs unless attribute improvement is widespread.

Agricultural and Resource Economics ReviewVol. 54(1)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US), University of Delaware (US)
National Science Foundation, University of Cambridge, Office of Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Measuring the value of water quality improvements for recreation use on an urban river: a travel cost contingent behavior approach — George R. Parsons, Joy Deep Chakrabartty · Agricultural and Resource Economics Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS