Artificial Attractants: Implications for Disease Management in Deer

Chronic wasting disease (CWD) is a prion disease that infects cervid species by direct and environmental transmission and is invariably fatal. CWD spread can be promoted by the attraction of animals to "hotspots" such as hay bales and grain bags stored in fields and at farm sites. The density and location of hotspots may impact contact rates. We used an individual-based movement model of mule deer (<i>Odocoileus hemionus</i>) to investigate the effects of density and configuration of hotspots (hereafter artificial attractants, AA) on contact rates at a constant density of 1 deer/km<sup>2</sup> during winter. The model tracks when two deer from the same or different groups come into contact under 6 AA densities (0-1 AA/km<sup>2</sup>) and 6 AA configurations. We compared placing AA randomly versus clustered around farms, and removing them randomly versus biased by proximity to preferred habitat. Overall, the number of unique contacts per individual and the number of unique deer visiting an AA increased, and the number of AAs used by each deer decreased as AA density declined. Selectively removing field attractants near preferred habitat resulted in a larger increase in contacts per deer, with deer contacting more and different individuals, fewer deer using the remaining AA, and fewer visits per AA than random removal. There was a greater increase in contact rates when reducing AA density at farms by randomly removing all AA at a farm compared to randomly removing individual AA across farms. Deer responses to AA removal may not be as straightforward as originally believed. Deer contacts may increase, not decrease, with AA removal because deer are attracted to the remaining AA. Under moderate deer densities, AA removal may require a broad-scale, "all or nothing" approach to prevent deer from concentrating at remaining AA, but concomitantly lowering deer density needs further assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71013
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Attractants: Implications for Disease Management in Deer

Mark A. Lewis, Evelyn H. Merrill, Margo J. Pybus, Kelsey Gritter
1 citations
Ecology and Evolution
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
article

Artificial Attractants: Implications for Disease Management in Deer

Mark A. Lewis, Evelyn H. Merrill, Margo J. Pybus, Kelsey Gritter
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Chronic wasting disease (CWD) is a prion disease that infects cervid species by direct and environmental transmission and is invariably fatal. CWD spread can be promoted by the attraction of animals to "hotspots" such as hay bales and grain bags stored in fields and at farm sites. The density and location of hotspots may impact contact rates. We used an individual-based movement model of mule deer (<i>Odocoileus hemionus</i>) to investigate the effects of density and configuration of hotspots (hereafter artificial attractants, AA) on contact rates at a constant density of 1 deer/km<sup>2</sup> during winter. The model tracks when two deer from the same or different groups come into contact under 6 AA densities (0-1 AA/km<sup>2</sup>) and 6 AA configurations. We compared placing AA randomly versus clustered around farms, and removing them randomly versus biased by proximity to preferred habitat. Overall, the number of unique contacts per individual and the number of unique deer visiting an AA increased, and the number of AAs used by each deer decreased as AA density declined. Selectively removing field attractants near preferred habitat resulted in a larger increase in contacts per deer, with deer contacting more and different individuals, fewer deer using the remaining AA, and fewer visits per AA than random removal. There was a greater increase in contact rates when reducing AA density at farms by randomly removing all AA at a farm compared to randomly removing individual AA across farms. Deer responses to AA removal may not be as straightforward as originally believed. Deer contacts may increase, not decrease, with AA removal because deer are attracted to the remaining AA. Under moderate deer densities, AA removal may require a broad-scale, "all or nothing" approach to prevent deer from concentrating at remaining AA, but concomitantly lowering deer density needs further assessment.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 15(2)
University of Alberta (CA), University of Victoria (CA), Government of Alberta (CA)
Alberta Conservation Association, Government of Alberta, Wildlife Management Institute, University of Alberta, Canada Research Chairs, Alberta Innovates, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.