Antibiotics and Surgically Treated Acute Appendicitis, When, Where, and Why?

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Antibiotics within an hour of incision reduce the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) in clean-contaminated abdominal surgery. However, patients undergoing emergency surgery for an intra-abdominal infectious process often receive treatment antibiotics and may not benefit from additional pre-incisional antibiotics (POA). We hypothesized that POA would not lead to a reduction in the occurrence of SSIs following emergency appendectomy. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> All patients at a single institution undergoing emergency appendectomies for acute appendicitis from 2013 to 2020 were included. Age, gender, perforation, body mass index (BMI), Elixhauser comorbidity index (ECI), surgical approach, emergency department antibiotics (EDA), EDA administration time, and pre-operative antibiotics were abstracted. Primary outcomes were superficial/deep and organ-space SSIs. Bi-variable logistic regression models assessed the independent impact of each tactic. Multi-variable models compared those receiving pre-incisional cefazolin with those receiving no POA. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Patients (n = 1380) had a mean age (standard deviation) of 39.5 (17.0) years, and 48.6% were female. Age, gender, perforated appendicitis, EDA, ECI, and BMI all were predictive of infection. POA were not predictive of SSI (p = 0.632). After adjustment for age, gender, perforation, EDA, EDA administration timing, ECI, and BMI, only perforation (odds ratio [OR]: 17.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 6.97-51.43) and male gender (OR: 2.75, 95% CI = 1.29-6.43) were associated with organ-space infection, whereas pre-incisional cefazolin was not (OR: 0.83, 95% CI = 0.38-1.97). Emergency department broad-spectrum antibiotics were associated with a lower incidence of superficial/deep infection (OR: 0.06, 95% CI = 0.00-0.68); however, pre-incisional cefazolin was not (OR: 0.71, 95% CI = 0.08-15.34). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> For patients undergoing emergency appendectomies who have received broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment, additional pre-incisional cefazolin does not reduce the incidence of superficial/deep or organ-space SSI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surgical Infections
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2024.264
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Antibiotics and Surgically Treated Acute Appendicitis, When, Where, and Why?

Alexander J. Kammien, Andrew Hendrix, Adrian A. Maung, Kevin M. Schuster et al.
1 citations
Surgical Infections
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
2.25
article

Antibiotics and Surgically Treated Acute Appendicitis, When, Where, and Why?

Alexander J. Kammien, Andrew Hendrix, Adrian A. Maung, Kevin M. Schuster, Kimberly A. Davis, Bishwajit Battacharya
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Antibiotics within an hour of incision reduce the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) in clean-contaminated abdominal surgery. However, patients undergoing emergency surgery for an intra-abdominal infectious process often receive treatment antibiotics and may not benefit from additional pre-incisional antibiotics (POA). We hypothesized that POA would not lead to a reduction in the occurrence of SSIs following emergency appendectomy. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> All patients at a single institution undergoing emergency appendectomies for acute appendicitis from 2013 to 2020 were included. Age, gender, perforation, body mass index (BMI), Elixhauser comorbidity index (ECI), surgical approach, emergency department antibiotics (EDA), EDA administration time, and pre-operative antibiotics were abstracted. Primary outcomes were superficial/deep and organ-space SSIs. Bi-variable logistic regression models assessed the independent impact of each tactic. Multi-variable models compared those receiving pre-incisional cefazolin with those receiving no POA. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Patients (n = 1380) had a mean age (standard deviation) of 39.5 (17.0) years, and 48.6% were female. Age, gender, perforated appendicitis, EDA, ECI, and BMI all were predictive of infection. POA were not predictive of SSI (p = 0.632). After adjustment for age, gender, perforation, EDA, EDA administration timing, ECI, and BMI, only perforation (odds ratio [OR]: 17.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 6.97-51.43) and male gender (OR: 2.75, 95% CI = 1.29-6.43) were associated with organ-space infection, whereas pre-incisional cefazolin was not (OR: 0.83, 95% CI = 0.38-1.97). Emergency department broad-spectrum antibiotics were associated with a lower incidence of superficial/deep infection (OR: 0.06, 95% CI = 0.00-0.68); however, pre-incisional cefazolin was not (OR: 0.71, 95% CI = 0.08-15.34). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> For patients undergoing emergency appendectomies who have received broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment, additional pre-incisional cefazolin does not reduce the incidence of superficial/deep or organ-space SSI.

Surgical InfectionsVol. 26(5)
University of South Carolina (US), Yale University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
2.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.