Tariffs and corporate political activity: a survey experiment on US businesses

Abstract The trade war with China has cost US producers and consumers hundreds of billions of dollars since 2018. Yet relatively few US businesses took action to oppose it. This study reports the results of an elite survey experiment on business political activity toward trade policy. Researchers presented business managers with information about the input costs of the new tariffs to their bottom line—information that most subjects acknowledged that they lacked—and invited them to take political action to express support or opposition to these tariffs. The results suggest that the novel information on economic costs did not significantly increase managers’ propensity to contact members of Congress, donate to political campaigns, sign petitions, or join social media groups. We also found that the firm’s political culture (liberal or conservative) did not significantly influence the effectiveness of the treatment. However, descriptive analysis showed that firm political culture was strongly related to the company’s support for the trade war, suggesting that these preexisting political beliefs were resistant to new information provided in our experiment even if that information could affect the company’s bottom line.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business and Politics
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2024.41
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tariffs and corporate political activity: a survey experiment on US businesses

Jiakun Jack Zhang, Robert Kubinec, Lindsay Dolan, Daniel Nielson
2 citations
Business and Politics
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
4.45
article

Tariffs and corporate political activity: a survey experiment on US businesses

Jiakun Jack Zhang, Robert Kubinec, Lindsay Dolan, Daniel Nielson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The trade war with China has cost US producers and consumers hundreds of billions of dollars since 2018. Yet relatively few US businesses took action to oppose it. This study reports the results of an elite survey experiment on business political activity toward trade policy. Researchers presented business managers with information about the input costs of the new tariffs to their bottom line—information that most subjects acknowledged that they lacked—and invited them to take political action to express support or opposition to these tariffs. The results suggest that the novel information on economic costs did not significantly increase managers’ propensity to contact members of Congress, donate to political campaigns, sign petitions, or join social media groups. We also found that the firm’s political culture (liberal or conservative) did not significantly influence the effectiveness of the treatment. However, descriptive analysis showed that firm political culture was strongly related to the company’s support for the trade war, suggesting that these preexisting political beliefs were resistant to new information provided in our experiment even if that information could affect the company’s bottom line.

Business and PoliticsVol. 27(3)
Wesleyan University (US), University of Kansas (US), University of South Carolina (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
American Political Science Association, Princeton University, Charles Koch Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
4.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.