Interacting Treatments With Endogenous Takeup

ABSTRACT We study causal inference in randomized experiments (or quasi‐experiments) following a factorial design. There are two treatments, denoted and , and units are randomly assigned to one of four categories: treatment alone, treatment alone, joint treatment, or none. Allowing for endogenous non‐compliance with the two binary instruments representing the intended assignment, as well as unrestricted interference across the two treatments, we derive the causal interpretation of various instrumental variable estimands under more general compliance conditions than in the literature. In general, if treatment takeup is driven by both instruments for some units, it becomes difficult to separate treatment interaction from treatment effect heterogeneity. We provide auxiliary conditions and various bounding strategies that may help zero in on causally interesting parameters. We apply our results to a program randomly offering two different treatments to first‐year college students, namely, tutoring and financial incentives, in order to assess the effect of the treatments on academic performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Econometrics
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.3120
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interacting Treatments With Endogenous Takeup

Robert P. Lieli, Martin Huber, M Kormos
Journal of Applied Econometrics
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
article

Interacting Treatments With Endogenous Takeup

Robert P. Lieli, Martin Huber, M Kormos
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We study causal inference in randomized experiments (or quasi‐experiments) following a factorial design. There are two treatments, denoted and , and units are randomly assigned to one of four categories: treatment alone, treatment alone, joint treatment, or none. Allowing for endogenous non‐compliance with the two binary instruments representing the intended assignment, as well as unrestricted interference across the two treatments, we derive the causal interpretation of various instrumental variable estimands under more general compliance conditions than in the literature. In general, if treatment takeup is driven by both instruments for some units, it becomes difficult to separate treatment interaction from treatment effect heterogeneity. We provide auxiliary conditions and various bounding strategies that may help zero in on causally interesting parameters. We apply our results to a program randomly offering two different treatments to first‐year college students, namely, tutoring and financial incentives, in order to assess the effect of the treatments on academic performance.

Journal of Applied EconometricsVol. 40(4)
University of Fribourg (CH), Central European University (AT), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Central European University
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.