CORPORATIZATION OF RAILWAY INFRASTRUCTURE IN UKRAINE, POLAND, AND KAZAKHSTAN: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MODELS AND OUTCOMES

This paper presents a comparative analysis of the models and outcomes of railway infrastructure corporatization in Ukraine, Poland, and Kazakhstan. The article aims to identify the key success factors, challenges, and opportunities for adapting the best practices of railway reform to the Ukrainian context. This goal is achieved through several research tasks: summarizing the historical context and evolution of railway corporatization in Ukraine; reviewing the initial conditions and main stages of railway corporatization in Poland and Kazakhstan; conducting a cross-comparative analysis of key indicators and reform outcomes; identifying lessons and recommendations for Ukraine based on the experiences of Poland and Kazakhstan; and developing proposals for applying successful foreign experiences to reform Ukraine’s railway system and foster national economic development. The research is based on a combination of historical and comparative methods. The authors provide a retrospective analysis of the corporatization process of JSC "Ukrzaliznytsia," identifying its main stages and outcomes. Through examples from Poland and Kazakhstan, alternative models of railway sector reform are analysed, considering both Eurointegration and Eurasian geopolitical contexts. Comparing the dynamics of key operational and financial indicators of railway companies in the three countries allowed for an assessment of the effectiveness of different approaches to corporatization. The article argues that successful reform of JSC "Ukrzaliznytsia" in the context of post-war recovery is critically dependent on creatively adapting Polish and Kazakh experiences, integrating them with Ukrainian realities. Three strategic priorities are proposed: optimizing the railway network for new logistics flows; digital transformation and process automation; and expanding public-private partnerships and cooperation with European railways. Key steps for implementation and ways to address challenges related to investment shortages and workforce deficits are outlined. The approaches and recommendations presented in the article may be useful for the management of JSC "Ukrzaliznytsia," government officials, experts, and all stakeholders involved in the development and implementation of Ukraine’s post-war railway sector recovery strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Economics
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26565/2524-2547-2024-68-01
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Transport and Economic Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CORPORATIZATION OF RAILWAY INFRASTRUCTURE IN UKRAINE, POLAND, AND KAZAKHSTAN: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MODELS AND OUTCOMES

Igor Dunayev, Serhii Hromov
2 citations
Social Economics
Transport and Economic Policies
1.11
article

CORPORATIZATION OF RAILWAY INFRASTRUCTURE IN UKRAINE, POLAND, AND KAZAKHSTAN: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MODELS AND OUTCOMES

Igor Dunayev, Serhii Hromov
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of the models and outcomes of railway infrastructure corporatization in Ukraine, Poland, and Kazakhstan. The article aims to identify the key success factors, challenges, and opportunities for adapting the best practices of railway reform to the Ukrainian context. This goal is achieved through several research tasks: summarizing the historical context and evolution of railway corporatization in Ukraine; reviewing the initial conditions and main stages of railway corporatization in Poland and Kazakhstan; conducting a cross-comparative analysis of key indicators and reform outcomes; identifying lessons and recommendations for Ukraine based on the experiences of Poland and Kazakhstan; and developing proposals for applying successful foreign experiences to reform Ukraine’s railway system and foster national economic development. The research is based on a combination of historical and comparative methods. The authors provide a retrospective analysis of the corporatization process of JSC "Ukrzaliznytsia," identifying its main stages and outcomes. Through examples from Poland and Kazakhstan, alternative models of railway sector reform are analysed, considering both Eurointegration and Eurasian geopolitical contexts. Comparing the dynamics of key operational and financial indicators of railway companies in the three countries allowed for an assessment of the effectiveness of different approaches to corporatization. The article argues that successful reform of JSC "Ukrzaliznytsia" in the context of post-war recovery is critically dependent on creatively adapting Polish and Kazakh experiences, integrating them with Ukrainian realities. Three strategic priorities are proposed: optimizing the railway network for new logistics flows; digital transformation and process automation; and expanding public-private partnerships and cooperation with European railways. Key steps for implementation and ways to address challenges related to investment shortages and workforce deficits are outlined. The approaches and recommendations presented in the article may be useful for the management of JSC "Ukrzaliznytsia," government officials, experts, and all stakeholders involved in the development and implementation of Ukraine’s post-war railway sector recovery strategy.

Social Economics(68)
V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Transport and Economic Policies
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.