“Civil war” concept verbalization in contemporary American political discourse

Aim. To identify the structure of the concept of “civil war” and its verbalization features in contempo­rary American political discourse. Methodology. The research is based on the application of textual, contextual and conceptual analysis methods. Results. During the research, it was concluded that the core of the meanings of the concept “civil war” includes “division” and “extreme violence”. The meanings “confrontation” and “chaos” can be referred to as the peripheral ones. The analysis of the corpus of social and political journalistic texts has shown that the representation of the “civil war” concept can be carried out explicitly and implic­itly, as well as at the level of interaction of linguistics and general semiotics in audiovisual form. In addition, the analyzed concept representatives may refer to vocabulary denoting the concepts of “in” and “out”, pejorative vocabulary, as well as “color markers” words. Research implications. Based on the results of the work, a model of conceptual analysis of modern American political discourse was proposed and its implementation in practice was demonstrated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Key Issues of Contemporary Linguistics
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5075-2024-6-17-28
Primary Topic
Cultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Civil war” concept verbalization in contemporary American political discourse

N. A. Bystrov
Key Issues of Contemporary Linguistics
Cultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies
article

“Civil war” concept verbalization in contemporary American political discourse

N. A. Bystrov
article en

Abstract

Aim. To identify the structure of the concept of “civil war” and its verbalization features in contempo­rary American political discourse. Methodology. The research is based on the application of textual, contextual and conceptual analysis methods. Results. During the research, it was concluded that the core of the meanings of the concept “civil war” includes “division” and “extreme violence”. The meanings “confrontation” and “chaos” can be referred to as the peripheral ones. The analysis of the corpus of social and political journalistic texts has shown that the representation of the “civil war” concept can be carried out explicitly and implic­itly, as well as at the level of interaction of linguistics and general semiotics in audiovisual form. In addition, the analyzed concept representatives may refer to vocabulary denoting the concepts of “in” and “out”, pejorative vocabulary, as well as “color markers” words. Research implications. Based on the results of the work, a model of conceptual analysis of modern American political discourse was proposed and its implementation in practice was demonstrated.

Key Issues of Contemporary Linguistics(6)
Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), MIREA - Russian Technological University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“Civil war” concept verbalization in contemporary American political discourse — N. A. Bystrov · Key Issues of Contemporary Linguistics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS