Automatic engagement of limbic and prefrontal networks in response to food images reflects distinct information about food hedonics and inhibitory control

Adaptive regulation of food consumption involves both identifying food as well as evaluating whether it should be eaten, a process that requires assessing relevant properties such as healthfulness and hedonic value. In order to identify how these fine-grained food properties are represented in the brain, we analyzed functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging data from 43 participants who viewed images of 36 different foods. A data-driven clustering approach based on Representational Similarity Analysis partitioned food-responsive brain regions into two sub-networks based on their multivariate response to food pictures: a Prefrontal network composed of fronto-parietal brain regions and a Limbic network composed of cortico-limbic and sub-cortical brain regions. Further analysis, using similarity judgments of those foods from a large online sample, revealed that the Prefrontal network predominantly represented information related to food healthfulness or processing, the key factor underlying food similarity. In another imaging task, we found that responses in the Prefrontal network were strongly influenced by judgments of food-related self-control, while the Limbic network responses were more affected by hedonic food judgments. These results suggest that, upon viewing food images, behaviorally relevant information is automatically retrieved from distinct brain networks that act as opponent processes in guiding food consumption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Biology
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-025-07704-w
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automatic engagement of limbic and prefrontal networks in response to food images reflects distinct information about food hedonics and inhibitory control

Madeline Carrington, Kevin D. Hall, Jason A. Avery, Alex Martin et al.
8 citations
Communications Biology
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
8.96
article

Automatic engagement of limbic and prefrontal networks in response to food images reflects distinct information about food hedonics and inhibitory control

Madeline Carrington, Kevin D. Hall, Jason A. Avery, Alex Martin, W. Kyle Simmons, John E. Ingeholm, Valerie L. Darcey
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Adaptive regulation of food consumption involves both identifying food as well as evaluating whether it should be eaten, a process that requires assessing relevant properties such as healthfulness and hedonic value. In order to identify how these fine-grained food properties are represented in the brain, we analyzed functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging data from 43 participants who viewed images of 36 different foods. A data-driven clustering approach based on Representational Similarity Analysis partitioned food-responsive brain regions into two sub-networks based on their multivariate response to food pictures: a Prefrontal network composed of fronto-parietal brain regions and a Limbic network composed of cortico-limbic and sub-cortical brain regions. Further analysis, using similarity judgments of those foods from a large online sample, revealed that the Prefrontal network predominantly represented information related to food healthfulness or processing, the key factor underlying food similarity. In another imaging task, we found that responses in the Prefrontal network were strongly influenced by judgments of food-related self-control, while the Limbic network responses were more affected by hedonic food judgments. These results suggest that, upon viewing food images, behaviorally relevant information is automatically retrieved from distinct brain networks that act as opponent processes in guiding food consumption.

Communications BiologyVol. 8(1)
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (US), National Institute of Mental Health (US), Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences (US)
National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
8.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.