Energy Efficiency and Carbon Emission Reduction in Coffee Roasting: Approach of Activity-Based Costing (ABC) Methodology

This study explores optimizing carbon emissions in the coffee bean roasting industry through the application of Activity-Based Costing (ABC). By analyzing three roasting product combinations—light roast, medium roast, and dark roast—the research evaluates production costs, energy consumption, carbon emissions, and profitability. The light roast demonstrates the highest profitability and the lowest environmental impact, offering a favorable balance between economic and environmental objectives. Light roasting reduces carbon emissions by 33.33% compared to dark roasting and by 16.67% compared to medium roasting. The medium roast achieves moderate profitability while maintaining manageable energy consumption and carbon emissions. Conversely, the dark roast, though profitable, shows significantly higher energy consumption and carbon emissions, highlighting the need for targeted improvements in process efficiency. This study underscores the advantages of ABC in providing precise cost allocation and identifying resource inefficiencies, enabling businesses to implement energy-efficient technologies and optimize operations. It also emphasizes the importance of adopting renewable energy sources and leveraging government incentives to align sustainability with financial goals. This study serves as a model for integrating economic performance with environmental responsibility, offering actionable insights for businesses. Future research could expand the scope of this approach to other continuous process industries, demonstrating its broader applicability and potential for improving sustainability across diverse sectors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18051018
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Diverse academic and cultural studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy Efficiency and Carbon Emission Reduction in Coffee Roasting: Approach of Activity-Based Costing (ABC) Methodology

Kuo-Hsien Lee, Wen-Hsien Tsai, Chung-Chen Huang
6 citations
Energies
Diverse academic and cultural studies
18.79
article

Energy Efficiency and Carbon Emission Reduction in Coffee Roasting: Approach of Activity-Based Costing (ABC) Methodology

Kuo-Hsien Lee, Wen-Hsien Tsai, Chung-Chen Huang
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This study explores optimizing carbon emissions in the coffee bean roasting industry through the application of Activity-Based Costing (ABC). By analyzing three roasting product combinations—light roast, medium roast, and dark roast—the research evaluates production costs, energy consumption, carbon emissions, and profitability. The light roast demonstrates the highest profitability and the lowest environmental impact, offering a favorable balance between economic and environmental objectives. Light roasting reduces carbon emissions by 33.33% compared to dark roasting and by 16.67% compared to medium roasting. The medium roast achieves moderate profitability while maintaining manageable energy consumption and carbon emissions. Conversely, the dark roast, though profitable, shows significantly higher energy consumption and carbon emissions, highlighting the need for targeted improvements in process efficiency. This study underscores the advantages of ABC in providing precise cost allocation and identifying resource inefficiencies, enabling businesses to implement energy-efficient technologies and optimize operations. It also emphasizes the importance of adopting renewable energy sources and leveraging government incentives to align sustainability with financial goals. This study serves as a model for integrating economic performance with environmental responsibility, offering actionable insights for businesses. Future research could expand the scope of this approach to other continuous process industries, demonstrating its broader applicability and potential for improving sustainability across diverse sectors.

EnergiesVol. 18(5)
National Central University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Diverse academic and cultural studies
18.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.