Monte Carlo simulations of energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) of liquid and metallic samples: A comparison and experimental validation of MCNP and XRMC codes

The present study compares numerical simulations carried out by two Monte Carlo codes, the Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) and the XRMC, of Energy Dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) excited in liquid and metallic samples. The results are validated by measurements with a laboratory-made equipment, consisting of a mini X-ray tube (Moxtek, Inc., 4 W, Ag target) and a Si PIN detector model X123 (Amptek, Inc.), configured in the usual 45°/45° geometry. The liquid sample was a multielementar stock solution from High Purity Standards containing traces of the transition metals Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn. For the solid samples, two metallic plates of standard reference materials were used, namely, a) a rectangular plate (6.9 mm × 43.4 mm, 1.5 mm thick) made of high purity copper; and b) a steel alloy plate (Duplex 2205 CRM) containing Si, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu and Mo in its composition. The quantitative analysis of the relative peak intensities between the simulations and experiment reveals a difference of 0.4 % to 12.3 %, depending on the elemental characteristic line and sample composition. The results show an overall very good agreement between the simulations of the MCNP and XRMC codes with the experimental spectra, making them suitable for typical EDXRF applications involving metallic samples and multielement aqueous solutions. • Validated Monte Carlo simulations of EDXRF carried out by MCNP and XRMC codes. • X-ray fluorescence excited in copper, steel plates and in a standard liquid sample. • Relative errors between 0.4 % and 12.3 % depending on the elemental characteristic line. • Overall very good agreement between simulations of MCNP and XRMC with experiments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Spectrochimica Acta Part B Atomic Spectroscopy
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2025.107157
Citations
1
Primary Topic
X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monte Carlo simulations of energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) of liquid and metallic samples: A comparison and experimental validation of MCNP and XRMC codes

P. Zambianchi, M. Antoniassi, Fábio Luiz Melquíades
1 citations
Spectrochimica Acta Part B Atomic Spectroscopy
X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
1.88
article

Monte Carlo simulations of energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) of liquid and metallic samples: A comparison and experimental validation of MCNP and XRMC codes

P. Zambianchi, M. Antoniassi, Fábio Luiz Melquíades
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The present study compares numerical simulations carried out by two Monte Carlo codes, the Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) and the XRMC, of Energy Dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) excited in liquid and metallic samples. The results are validated by measurements with a laboratory-made equipment, consisting of a mini X-ray tube (Moxtek, Inc., 4 W, Ag target) and a Si PIN detector model X123 (Amptek, Inc.), configured in the usual 45°/45° geometry. The liquid sample was a multielementar stock solution from High Purity Standards containing traces of the transition metals Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn. For the solid samples, two metallic plates of standard reference materials were used, namely, a) a rectangular plate (6.9 mm × 43.4 mm, 1.5 mm thick) made of high purity copper; and b) a steel alloy plate (Duplex 2205 CRM) containing Si, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu and Mo in its composition. The quantitative analysis of the relative peak intensities between the simulations and experiment reveals a difference of 0.4 % to 12.3 %, depending on the elemental characteristic line and sample composition. The results show an overall very good agreement between the simulations of the MCNP and XRMC codes with the experimental spectra, making them suitable for typical EDXRF applications involving metallic samples and multielement aqueous solutions. • Validated Monte Carlo simulations of EDXRF carried out by MCNP and XRMC codes. • X-ray fluorescence excited in copper, steel plates and in a standard liquid sample. • Relative errors between 0.4 % and 12.3 % depending on the elemental characteristic line. • Overall very good agreement between simulations of MCNP and XRMC with experiments.

Spectrochimica Acta Part B Atomic SpectroscopyVol. 227
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (BR), Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (BR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.