An Example to Illustrate Randomized Trial Estimands and Estimators

Recently, the International Conference on Harmonisation finalized an estimand framework for randomized trials that was adopted by regulatory bodies worldwide. The framework introduced five strategies for handling post-randomization events; namely the treatment policy, composite variable, while on treatment, hypothetical and principal stratum estimands. We describe an illustrative example to elucidate the difference between these five strategies for handling intercurrent events and provide an estimation technique for each. Specifically, we consider the intercurrent event of treatment discontinuation and introduce potential outcome notation to describe five estimands and corresponding estimators: 1) an intention-to-treat estimator of the total effect of a treatment policy; 2) an intention-to-treat estimator of a composite of the outcome and remaining on treatment; 3) a per-protocol estimator of the outcome in individuals observed to remain on treatment; 4) a g-computation estimator of a hypothetical scenario that all individuals remain on treatment; and 5) a principal stratum estimator of the treatment effect in individuals who would remain on treatment under the experimental condition. Additional insight is provided by defining situations where certain estimands are equal, and by studying the while on treatment strategy under repeated outcome measures. We highlight relevant causal inference literature to enable adoption in practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Statistician
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2025.2468399
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Example to Illustrate Randomized Trial Estimands and Estimators

Sean S. Brummel, Linda J. Harrison
1 citations
The American Statistician
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
2.63
article

An Example to Illustrate Randomized Trial Estimands and Estimators

Sean S. Brummel, Linda J. Harrison
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Recently, the International Conference on Harmonisation finalized an estimand framework for randomized trials that was adopted by regulatory bodies worldwide. The framework introduced five strategies for handling post-randomization events; namely the treatment policy, composite variable, while on treatment, hypothetical and principal stratum estimands. We describe an illustrative example to elucidate the difference between these five strategies for handling intercurrent events and provide an estimation technique for each. Specifically, we consider the intercurrent event of treatment discontinuation and introduce potential outcome notation to describe five estimands and corresponding estimators: 1) an intention-to-treat estimator of the total effect of a treatment policy; 2) an intention-to-treat estimator of a composite of the outcome and remaining on treatment; 3) a per-protocol estimator of the outcome in individuals observed to remain on treatment; 4) a g-computation estimator of a hypothetical scenario that all individuals remain on treatment; and 5) a principal stratum estimator of the treatment effect in individuals who would remain on treatment under the experimental condition. Additional insight is provided by defining situations where certain estimands are equal, and by studying the while on treatment strategy under repeated outcome measures. We highlight relevant causal inference literature to enable adoption in practice.

The American StatisticianVol. 79(3)
Cancer Research And Biostatistics (US)
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
2.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.