Large language models for error detection in radiology reports: a comparative analysis between closed-source and privacy-compliant open-source models

Question Can privacy-compliant open-source large language models (LLMs) match the error-detection performance of commercial non-privacy-compliant closed-source models in radiology reports? Findings Closed-source LLMs achieved slightly higher accuracy in detecting radiology report errors than open-source models, with Llama 3-70b yielding the best results among the open-source models. Clinical relevance Open-source LLMs offer a privacy-compliant alternative for automated error detection in radiology reports, improving clinical workflow efficiency while ensuring patient data confidentiality. Further refinement could enhance their accuracy, contributing to better diagnosis and patient care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Radiology
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11438-y
Citations
22
Primary Topic
Radiology practices and education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
29.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Large language models for error detection in radiology reports: a comparative analysis between closed-source and privacy-compliant open-source models

Maike Theis, Daniel Kuetting, Julian Alexander Luetkens, Dmitrij Kravchenko et al.
22 citations
European Radiology
Radiology practices and education
29.92
article

Large language models for error detection in radiology reports: a comparative analysis between closed-source and privacy-compliant open-source models

Maike Theis, Daniel Kuetting, Julian Alexander Luetkens, Dmitrij Kravchenko, Tatjana Dell, Claus Christian Pieper, Christoph Endler, Sebastian Nowak, Narine Mesropyan, Alexander Isaak, Alois M. Sprinkart, Babak Salam, Claire Stüwe
article en
22 citations

Abstract

Question Can privacy-compliant open-source large language models (LLMs) match the error-detection performance of commercial non-privacy-compliant closed-source models in radiology reports? Findings Closed-source LLMs achieved slightly higher accuracy in detecting radiology report errors than open-source models, with Llama 3-70b yielding the best results among the open-source models. Clinical relevance Open-source LLMs offer a privacy-compliant alternative for automated error detection in radiology reports, improving clinical workflow efficiency while ensuring patient data confidentiality. Further refinement could enhance their accuracy, contributing to better diagnosis and patient care.

European RadiologyVol. 35(8)
University Hospital Bonn (DE)
Ernst und Berta Grimmke Stiftung
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Radiology practices and education
29.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.