Comparison of keratometry assessment between IOLMaster and Pentacam in dry eyes

Dry eye has significantly greater impact on keratometry measured with IOLMaster than with Pentacam. For cases with A-ACS between the two devices over 0.5 D, artificial tears are recommended before performing biometry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2025.104527
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of keratometry assessment between IOLMaster and Pentacam in dry eyes

Jiayin Qin, Fei Yang, Xijuan Wang, Mingwu Li
1 citations
Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
1.88
article

Comparison of keratometry assessment between IOLMaster and Pentacam in dry eyes

Jiayin Qin, Fei Yang, Xijuan Wang, Mingwu Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Dry eye has significantly greater impact on keratometry measured with IOLMaster than with Pentacam. For cases with A-ACS between the two devices over 0.5 D, artificial tears are recommended before performing biometry.

Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic TherapyVol. 52
Peking University (CN), Peking University International Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.