Application of principal stress differentials to rockburst risk analysis and prevention

The principal stresses will increase or decrease during mining, leading to variations in surrounding rock strength and subsequently an influence on the risk of rockbursts. To address this issue, this study conducted theoretical analysis, numerical simulation, and field monitoring. A rockburst risk analysis method that integrates dynamic changes in the stress and strength of surrounding rock was proposed and verified in the field. The dynamic changes in maximum ( σ 1 ) and minimum ( σ 3 ) principal stresses are represented by the σ 1 and σ 3 differentials, respectively. The difference in principal stress differential (DPSD), defined as the difference between σ 1 and σ 3 , was introduced as a novel indicator for rockburst risk analysis. The findings of this study demonstrate a positive correlation between increases in DPSD and heightened risks of rockbursts, as evidenced by an increase in both the frequency of rockbursts and the occurrence of large-energy microseismic events. Conversely, a decrease in DPSD is associated with a reduction in risk. Specifically, in the W1123 panel of a coal mine susceptible to rockbursts, areas exhibiting higher DPSD values experienced more frequent and severe rockbursts. The DPSD-based analysis aligned well with the observed rockburst occurrences. Subsequent optimization of rockburst prevention measures in areas with elevated DPSD led to a reduction in DPSD. Following these adjustments, the W1123 panel predominantly experienced low-energy microseismic events, with a significant decrease in large-energy microseismic events and no further rockbursts. The DPSD analysis is a valuable tool for evaluating rockburst risk and aiding in prevention, which is of great significance for disaster prevention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.11.059
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Geomechanics and Mining Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of principal stress differentials to rockburst risk analysis and prevention

Wei Yang, Xueqiu He, Dazhao Song, Zhenlei Li et al.
3 citations
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Geomechanics and Mining Engineering
2.59
article

Application of principal stress differentials to rockburst risk analysis and prevention

Wei Yang, Xueqiu He, Dazhao Song, Zhenlei Li, Rui Fan, Taoping Zhong, Jianqiang Chen, Chao Zhou
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The principal stresses will increase or decrease during mining, leading to variations in surrounding rock strength and subsequently an influence on the risk of rockbursts. To address this issue, this study conducted theoretical analysis, numerical simulation, and field monitoring. A rockburst risk analysis method that integrates dynamic changes in the stress and strength of surrounding rock was proposed and verified in the field. The dynamic changes in maximum ( σ 1 ) and minimum ( σ 3 ) principal stresses are represented by the σ 1 and σ 3 differentials, respectively. The difference in principal stress differential (DPSD), defined as the difference between σ 1 and σ 3 , was introduced as a novel indicator for rockburst risk analysis. The findings of this study demonstrate a positive correlation between increases in DPSD and heightened risks of rockbursts, as evidenced by an increase in both the frequency of rockbursts and the occurrence of large-energy microseismic events. Conversely, a decrease in DPSD is associated with a reduction in risk. Specifically, in the W1123 panel of a coal mine susceptible to rockbursts, areas exhibiting higher DPSD values experienced more frequent and severe rockbursts. The DPSD-based analysis aligned well with the observed rockburst occurrences. Subsequent optimization of rockburst prevention measures in areas with elevated DPSD led to a reduction in DPSD. Following these adjustments, the W1123 panel predominantly experienced low-energy microseismic events, with a significant decrease in large-energy microseismic events and no further rockbursts. The DPSD analysis is a valuable tool for evaluating rockburst risk and aiding in prevention, which is of great significance for disaster prevention.

Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical EngineeringVol. 17(6)
China University of Mining and Technology (CN), Nano Energy (South Africa) (ZA), Xinjiang New Energy Research Institute (China) (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Geomechanics and Mining Engineering
2.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.