PhenoCam Guidelines for Phenological Measurement and Analysis in an Agricultural Cropping Environment: A Case Study of Soybean

A PhenoCam is a near-surface remote sensing system traditionally used for monitoring phenological changes in diverse landscapes. Although initially developed for forest landscapes, these near-surface remote sensing systems are increasingly being adopted in agricultural settings, with deployment expanding from 106 sites in 2020 to 839 sites by February 2025. However, agricultural applications present unique challenges because of rapid crop development and the need for precise phenological monitoring. Despite the increasing number of PhenoCam sites, clear guidelines are missing on (i) the phenological analysis of images, (ii) the selection of a suitable color vegetation index (CVI), and (iii) the extraction of growth stages. This knowledge gap limits the full potential of PhenoCams in agricultural applications. Therefore, a study was conducted in two soybean (Glycine max L.) fields to formulate image analysis guidelines for PhenoCam images. Weekly visual assessments of soybean phenological stages were compared with PhenoCam images. A total of 15 CVIs were tested for their ability to reproduce the seasonal variation from RGB, HSB, and Lab color spaces. The effects of image acquisition time groups (10:00 h–14:00 h) and object position (ROI locations: far, middle, and near) on selected CVIs were statistically analyzed. Excess green minus excess red (EXGR), color index of vegetation (CIVE), green leaf index (GLI), and normalized green red difference index (NGRDI) were selected based on the least deviation from their loess-smoothed phenological curve at each image acquisition time. For the selected four CVIs, the time groups did not have a significant effect on CVI values, while the object position had significant effects at the reproductive phase. Among the selected CVIs, GLI and EXGR exhibited the least deviation within the image acquisition time and object position groups. Overall, we recommend employing a consistent image acquisition time to ensure sufficient light, capture the largest possible image ROI in the middle region of the field, and apply any of the selected CVIs in order of GLI, EXGR, NGRDI, and CIVE. These results provide a standardized methodology and serve as guidelines for PhenoCam image analysis in agricultural cropping environments. These guidelines can be incorporated into the standard protocol of the PhenoCam network.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2025-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17040724
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PhenoCam Guidelines for Phenological Measurement and Analysis in an Agricultural Cropping Environment: A Case Study of Soybean

John Hendrickson, Mark A. Liebig, Cannayen Igathinathane, Sunoj Shajahan et al.
3 citations
Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
5.15
article

PhenoCam Guidelines for Phenological Measurement and Analysis in an Agricultural Cropping Environment: A Case Study of Soybean

John Hendrickson, Mark A. Liebig, Cannayen Igathinathane, Sunoj Shajahan, David Walter Archer, Nicanor Z. Saliendra
article en
3 citations

Abstract

A PhenoCam is a near-surface remote sensing system traditionally used for monitoring phenological changes in diverse landscapes. Although initially developed for forest landscapes, these near-surface remote sensing systems are increasingly being adopted in agricultural settings, with deployment expanding from 106 sites in 2020 to 839 sites by February 2025. However, agricultural applications present unique challenges because of rapid crop development and the need for precise phenological monitoring. Despite the increasing number of PhenoCam sites, clear guidelines are missing on (i) the phenological analysis of images, (ii) the selection of a suitable color vegetation index (CVI), and (iii) the extraction of growth stages. This knowledge gap limits the full potential of PhenoCams in agricultural applications. Therefore, a study was conducted in two soybean (Glycine max L.) fields to formulate image analysis guidelines for PhenoCam images. Weekly visual assessments of soybean phenological stages were compared with PhenoCam images. A total of 15 CVIs were tested for their ability to reproduce the seasonal variation from RGB, HSB, and Lab color spaces. The effects of image acquisition time groups (10:00 h–14:00 h) and object position (ROI locations: far, middle, and near) on selected CVIs were statistically analyzed. Excess green minus excess red (EXGR), color index of vegetation (CIVE), green leaf index (GLI), and normalized green red difference index (NGRDI) were selected based on the least deviation from their loess-smoothed phenological curve at each image acquisition time. For the selected four CVIs, the time groups did not have a significant effect on CVI values, while the object position had significant effects at the reproductive phase. Among the selected CVIs, GLI and EXGR exhibited the least deviation within the image acquisition time and object position groups. Overall, we recommend employing a consistent image acquisition time to ensure sufficient light, capture the largest possible image ROI in the middle region of the field, and apply any of the selected CVIs in order of GLI, EXGR, NGRDI, and CIVE. These results provide a standardized methodology and serve as guidelines for PhenoCam image analysis in agricultural cropping environments. These guidelines can be incorporated into the standard protocol of the PhenoCam network.

Remote SensingVol. 17(4)
Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory (US), North Dakota State University (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Northeastern States Research Cooperative, U.S. Geological Survey, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, National Park Service, Agricultural Research Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
5.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.